Cell phone radiation is a fairly new thing in today's modern world. Today, everyone has a cell phone, young children included. I don't think we will truly know the effects for another ten or twenty years. Until then, it is better to be on the safe side.
Anything that emits radiation is potentially dangerous and therefore should be handled with care. Cell phones are no different. I am sure the cell phone industry is doing their best to spread lies and misinformation about the potential dangers. Common sense tells me that holding a cell phone that emits radiation that close to the brain is bound to cause problems. This list may be helpful to limit radiation exposure as much as possible.
EWG’s Guide to Reduce Cell Phone Radiation Exposure
Cell phones emit radiation to send voice and text messages to the other caller. Health risks aren’t confirmed, but some (not all) studies of frequent cell phone users suggest increased risks for brain and mouth tumors and children’s behavior problems.
To be on the safe side, follow the tips below to reduce exposures.
1. BUY A LOW-RADIATION PHONE
Look up your phone on EWG’s buyer’s guide. (Your phone's model number may be printed under your battery.) Consider replacing your phone with one that emits the lowest radiation possible and still meets your needs.
2. USE A HEADSET OR SPEAKER
Headsets emit much less radiation than phones. Choose either wired or wireless (experts are split on which version is safer) using our cell phone headset guide. Some wireless headsets emit continuous, low-level radiation, so take yours off your ear when you're not on a call. Using your phone in speaker mode also reduces radiation to the head.
3. LISTEN MORE, TALK LESS
Your phone emits radiation when you talk or text, but not when you're receiving messages. Listening more and talking less reduces your exposures.
4. HOLD PHONE AWAY FROM YOUR BODY
Hold the phone away from your torso when you're talking (with headset or speaker), not against your ear, in a pocket, or on your belt where soft body tissues absorb radiation.
5. CHOOSE TEXTING OVER TALKING
Phones use less power (less radiation) to send text than voice. And unlike when you speak with the phone at your ear, texting keeps radiation away from your head.
6. POOR SIGNAL? STAY OFF THE PHONE
Fewer signal bars on your phone means that it emits more radiation to get the signal to the tower. Make and take calls when your phone has a strong signal.
7. LIMIT CHILDREN’S PHONE USE
Young children’s brains absorb twice the cell phone radiation as an adult’s. EWG joins health agencies in at least 6 countries in recommending limits for children’s phone use, such as for emergency situations only.
8. SKIP THE “RADIATION SHIELD”
Radiation shields such as antenna caps or keypad covers reduce the connection quality and force the phone to transmit at a higher power with higher radiation
Monday, November 15, 2010
ENVIRONMENTAL WORKING GROUP PESTICIDE GUIDE
http://static.foodnews.org/pdf/2010-foodnews-data.pdf
The link above is the Environmental Working Group's data on pesticides on fruits and vegetables consumed in this country. I have provided other lists similar but this is by far the most comprehensive list I have seen. This is the most thorough chart in regards to the number of pesticides used per fruit/vegetable, how many pesticides were used on the entire commodity, pesticides in parts per million found on the fruit/ vegetable etc...
This list is insane! Celery was found to have the most pesticides used. The samples tested were found to have 13 different pesticides. Eating 13 different pesticides is suicide. Many pesticides tested on their own have been linked to many health problems in humans. However, it is nearly impossible for anyone to tell the harmful effects of mixing 13 different pesticides and the danger it poses to the human body.
Strawberries and peaches were also amongst the fruits and veggies with the highest pesticide content. Stay away from all non organic fruits and veggies that are high on the list at all cost. Eating these is like sprinkling rat poison on your food before eating to add flavor.( 13 different rat poisons for some tested) Fruits and vegetables with the lowest amount of pesticides are asparagus and onions. This is a useful list to use when choosing to buy organic or non organic. Obviously buying organic as much as possible is ideal. This list includes all NON organic fruits and vegetables. These pesticides are not found on organic crops. Pass this list along. I often hear the arguement that organic foods are much more expensive and not worth the price. Prevention is much cheaper than treatment for serious disease!
The link above is the Environmental Working Group's data on pesticides on fruits and vegetables consumed in this country. I have provided other lists similar but this is by far the most comprehensive list I have seen. This is the most thorough chart in regards to the number of pesticides used per fruit/vegetable, how many pesticides were used on the entire commodity, pesticides in parts per million found on the fruit/ vegetable etc...
This list is insane! Celery was found to have the most pesticides used. The samples tested were found to have 13 different pesticides. Eating 13 different pesticides is suicide. Many pesticides tested on their own have been linked to many health problems in humans. However, it is nearly impossible for anyone to tell the harmful effects of mixing 13 different pesticides and the danger it poses to the human body.
Strawberries and peaches were also amongst the fruits and veggies with the highest pesticide content. Stay away from all non organic fruits and veggies that are high on the list at all cost. Eating these is like sprinkling rat poison on your food before eating to add flavor.( 13 different rat poisons for some tested) Fruits and vegetables with the lowest amount of pesticides are asparagus and onions. This is a useful list to use when choosing to buy organic or non organic. Obviously buying organic as much as possible is ideal. This list includes all NON organic fruits and vegetables. These pesticides are not found on organic crops. Pass this list along. I often hear the arguement that organic foods are much more expensive and not worth the price. Prevention is much cheaper than treatment for serious disease!
Sunday, November 14, 2010
OPT OUT OF BODY SCANNERS AT AIRPORTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of you will be flying over the next month for the holidays. Some will be flying multiple times and I believe it is important to know the new health dangers at airports. Many of you have probably read in the news about the new TSA body scanners now being used at most major airports. There is a lot of controversy surrounding these devices. The machines expose you to very high levels of concentrated radiation which we already know is a major cause of cancer. Not to mention these machines seem to be very invasive. Do some research and make your own decision as to whether you want to walk through them. You have the option to opt out of it and be groped by a TSA agent instead. Many of the major airlines as well as pilot unions have urged their pilots to opt out of these because of the exposure to radiation. I would advise all of you to follow suit. Below is part of an article from the website prisonplanet.com talking about the dangers of the devices.
Airport body scanners could lead to an increase in skin cancers according to scientists at Columbia University, who warn that the dose emitted by the naked x-ray devices could be up to 20 times higher than originally estimated, in another clear example of how the scanners are completely illegal, dangerous to public health, and need to be removed immediately.
Dr David Brenner, head of Columbia University’s centre for radiological research, warns that children and people with gene mutations whose bodies are less able to repair damage to their DNA are most at risk.
“If all 800 million people who use airports every year were screened with X-rays then the very small individual risk multiplied by the large number of screened people might imply a potential public health or societal risk. The population risk has the potential to be significant,” said Brenner.
Brenner’s research shows that the scanners will likely contribute to an increase in a common type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma which affects the head and neck.
“If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children, they would most likely appear some decades in the future. It would be prudent not to scan the head and neck,” added Brenner.
Brenner has urged medical authorities to look at his work, pointing to the dangerous notion of mass scanning millions of people without proper oversight.
“There really is no other technology around where we’re planning to X-ray such an enormous number of individuals. It’s really unprecedented in the radiation world,” said Brenner.
Similar concerns to those explored in the Columbia University study were voiced back in February by the influential Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, who warned in a report that the scanners increase the risk of cancer and birth defects and should not be used on pregnant women or children.
Despite governments claiming that backscatter x-ray systems produce radiation too low to pose a threat, the organization concluded in their report that governments must justify the use of the scanners and that a more accurate assessment of the health risks is needed.
Pregnant women and children should not be subject to scanning, according to the report, adding that governments should consider “other techniques to achieve the same end without the use of ionizing radiation.”
“The Committee cited the IAEA’s 1996 Basic Safety Standards agreement, drafted over three decades, that protects people from radiation. Frequent exposure to low doses of radiation can lead to cancer and birth defects, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,” reported Bloomberg.
In the United States, people can refuse the body scanner and opt for an aggressive and intrusive hand-search, but people traveling out of the UK and other areas of Europe don’t even get the choice – they are forced to go through the scanner if asked and cannot refuse or they are banned from traveling. Despite the media reporting universal acceptance of the scanners, in reality 600 formal complaints had been made about the devices in the first two months of their usage alone.
The alarming health concerns surrounding body scanners have been equaled by the shaky legality of the devices. In the UK, the scanners break child porn laws which forbid the production of indecent images of children, but the UK transport authorities have broken the law and mandated that children be required to pass through the machines.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) also wrote a letter to the UK government warning that the scanners broke privacy laws.
As we have highlighted, not only do the body scanners pose health risks but they also violate the fundamental human right of the innocent to be protected against strip-searches.
Despite official denials that the images produced by the devices show details of genitalia, journalists who have investigated trials of the technology have reported that details of sexual organs are “eerily visible”.
Indeed, as we have previously highlighted, when the scanners were first introduced at Australian airports in 2008 it was admitted that the X-ray backscatter devices don’t work properly unless the genitals of people going through them are visible. “It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities,” said Melbourne Airport’s Office of Transport Security manager Cheryl Johnson.
Attempts to keep this under wraps by lying about the images produced are an effort to head off challenges to the legality of the devices. Historically, civil lawsuits where an individual has been strip searched by a member of the opposite sex have proven to be successful in North America.
Courts have consistently found that strip searches are only legal when performed on a person who has already been found guilty of a crime or on arrestees pending trial where a reasonable suspicion has to exist that they are carrying a weapon. Subjecting masses of people to blanket strip searches in airports reverses the very notion of innocent until proven guilty.
Barring people from flying and essentially treating them like terrorists for refusing to be humiliated by the virtual strip search is a clear breach of the basic human right of freedom of movement.
Several examples of airport security staff abusing the use of the devices have already come to light since their introduction earlier this year.
Indian film star Shahrukh Khan told a BBC talk show that naked images of his body from the scanner were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan himself never retracted the story, and had no apparent motive for making it up.
Heathrow authorities were unable to deny a later example of the scanners being abused, when it emerged that a Heathrow worker had perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.
Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.
In Miami, a TSA worker in Miami attacked a colleague who had made fun of his small penis after he passed through a scanner device. The story again emphasized the fact that authorities were brazenly lying in claiming that the images produced by the devices did not show intimate details of genitalia.
Airport body scanners could lead to an increase in skin cancers according to scientists at Columbia University, who warn that the dose emitted by the naked x-ray devices could be up to 20 times higher than originally estimated, in another clear example of how the scanners are completely illegal, dangerous to public health, and need to be removed immediately.
Dr David Brenner, head of Columbia University’s centre for radiological research, warns that children and people with gene mutations whose bodies are less able to repair damage to their DNA are most at risk.
“If all 800 million people who use airports every year were screened with X-rays then the very small individual risk multiplied by the large number of screened people might imply a potential public health or societal risk. The population risk has the potential to be significant,” said Brenner.
Brenner’s research shows that the scanners will likely contribute to an increase in a common type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma which affects the head and neck.
“If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children, they would most likely appear some decades in the future. It would be prudent not to scan the head and neck,” added Brenner.
Brenner has urged medical authorities to look at his work, pointing to the dangerous notion of mass scanning millions of people without proper oversight.
“There really is no other technology around where we’re planning to X-ray such an enormous number of individuals. It’s really unprecedented in the radiation world,” said Brenner.
Similar concerns to those explored in the Columbia University study were voiced back in February by the influential Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, who warned in a report that the scanners increase the risk of cancer and birth defects and should not be used on pregnant women or children.
Despite governments claiming that backscatter x-ray systems produce radiation too low to pose a threat, the organization concluded in their report that governments must justify the use of the scanners and that a more accurate assessment of the health risks is needed.
Pregnant women and children should not be subject to scanning, according to the report, adding that governments should consider “other techniques to achieve the same end without the use of ionizing radiation.”
“The Committee cited the IAEA’s 1996 Basic Safety Standards agreement, drafted over three decades, that protects people from radiation. Frequent exposure to low doses of radiation can lead to cancer and birth defects, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,” reported Bloomberg.
In the United States, people can refuse the body scanner and opt for an aggressive and intrusive hand-search, but people traveling out of the UK and other areas of Europe don’t even get the choice – they are forced to go through the scanner if asked and cannot refuse or they are banned from traveling. Despite the media reporting universal acceptance of the scanners, in reality 600 formal complaints had been made about the devices in the first two months of their usage alone.
The alarming health concerns surrounding body scanners have been equaled by the shaky legality of the devices. In the UK, the scanners break child porn laws which forbid the production of indecent images of children, but the UK transport authorities have broken the law and mandated that children be required to pass through the machines.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) also wrote a letter to the UK government warning that the scanners broke privacy laws.
As we have highlighted, not only do the body scanners pose health risks but they also violate the fundamental human right of the innocent to be protected against strip-searches.
Despite official denials that the images produced by the devices show details of genitalia, journalists who have investigated trials of the technology have reported that details of sexual organs are “eerily visible”.
Indeed, as we have previously highlighted, when the scanners were first introduced at Australian airports in 2008 it was admitted that the X-ray backscatter devices don’t work properly unless the genitals of people going through them are visible. “It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities,” said Melbourne Airport’s Office of Transport Security manager Cheryl Johnson.
Attempts to keep this under wraps by lying about the images produced are an effort to head off challenges to the legality of the devices. Historically, civil lawsuits where an individual has been strip searched by a member of the opposite sex have proven to be successful in North America.
Courts have consistently found that strip searches are only legal when performed on a person who has already been found guilty of a crime or on arrestees pending trial where a reasonable suspicion has to exist that they are carrying a weapon. Subjecting masses of people to blanket strip searches in airports reverses the very notion of innocent until proven guilty.
Barring people from flying and essentially treating them like terrorists for refusing to be humiliated by the virtual strip search is a clear breach of the basic human right of freedom of movement.
Several examples of airport security staff abusing the use of the devices have already come to light since their introduction earlier this year.
Indian film star Shahrukh Khan told a BBC talk show that naked images of his body from the scanner were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan himself never retracted the story, and had no apparent motive for making it up.
Heathrow authorities were unable to deny a later example of the scanners being abused, when it emerged that a Heathrow worker had perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.
Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.
In Miami, a TSA worker in Miami attacked a colleague who had made fun of his small penis after he passed through a scanner device. The story again emphasized the fact that authorities were brazenly lying in claiming that the images produced by the devices did not show intimate details of genitalia.
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
RECOVERING FROM SURGERIES
It is time for an update, its been a little while. I am in the process of recovering from the two surgeries in the last few weeks. The first surgery was to remove the large legion on my leg. The surgery was done by Dr. J Raj who is the chief of plastic surgery at Fairview Hospital. The melanoma site was completely walled off to the rest of my body just as Dr. Buttar had predicted. There was no spreading to any other parts of the leg. Dr. Raj was initially concerned that the tumor had grown onto the tendon of my leg and that could pose a major problem. This was not the case, the surgeon said it could not have gone any better.
The surgery went well, although a much larger chunk of skin was taken than I had anticipated. I had a hole in my leg the size of a softball for about a week. Extremely painful!!!! Dr, Raj told me had I gone through the "traditional" treatment the area would have been at least twice the size. Having an open wound for a week on that part of your body was some of the worst pain I had ever experienced in my life!
After about a week of the wound being open, Dr. Raj went back in and performed a skin graph. The donor site was taken from my right thigh. The doctor compared the graph to a cheese grader. The skin that is taken off of the leg is so thin you can see through it if held up to a light. The wound from the donor site is a 5 by 10 inch rectangle which has a thin piece of gauze as dressing to cover it up and that is it. My right leg where the graph was given is in a half cast just below my knee. I have been totally immobilized since last Wednesday. I was instructed to not move at all. The graphed area is wrapped in a cast, as well as hooked up to a wound vac. The wound vac is a sponge attached to the wound with a tube connected to a little pump. The pump sucks out all of the drainage to expedite the healing process. The doctors and nurses have all raved that this can cut the healing time in half.
The doctor was very happy with the results of the second surgery as well. I have an appointment on Thursday to hopefully remove the splint and the wound vac and get back to some sort of normalcy. I am confidant that the process will continue to go in the direction we had initially anticipated and by Christmas of this year I will be free and clear of this nonsense forever. I am scheduled to go back to Dr. Buttar's clinic in the next month or so and get one last round of the AARSOTA shots as a precaution. He was concerned that any time you cut into something with cancer, it tends to spread. My immune system is back working properly so this will not be an issue but a worthwhile precaution to close out this process.
I will continue to update more in the near future. I have been in a lot of pain and taking a lot of pills ( which I tried to refuse until the pain came on) and have not felt much like typing. I appreciate all of the calls, e mails and texts. If I have not responded I apologize. These last few weeks have been difficult and talking has not been on the top of my list. I want to thank everyone who has been so helpful in the last few weeks. Lots of good food and love have come to the house and that has been a blessing. I want to thank all of my helpers, I am sure I have been a total pain in the ass and I sincerely appreciate all you have done!!!!!!!
Please take some of the information in the previous posts and put it to good use. This year has been totally crazy and I believe had I known what I know now I would not have had to have gone through all of this. Cancer is mostly preventable!!!!! Use the information wisely and don't let this happen to you. The crazy thing is the way I went is most likely much less physically taxing and probably much less painful than the traditional route and this has not been fun!!!!!
The surgery went well, although a much larger chunk of skin was taken than I had anticipated. I had a hole in my leg the size of a softball for about a week. Extremely painful!!!! Dr, Raj told me had I gone through the "traditional" treatment the area would have been at least twice the size. Having an open wound for a week on that part of your body was some of the worst pain I had ever experienced in my life!
After about a week of the wound being open, Dr. Raj went back in and performed a skin graph. The donor site was taken from my right thigh. The doctor compared the graph to a cheese grader. The skin that is taken off of the leg is so thin you can see through it if held up to a light. The wound from the donor site is a 5 by 10 inch rectangle which has a thin piece of gauze as dressing to cover it up and that is it. My right leg where the graph was given is in a half cast just below my knee. I have been totally immobilized since last Wednesday. I was instructed to not move at all. The graphed area is wrapped in a cast, as well as hooked up to a wound vac. The wound vac is a sponge attached to the wound with a tube connected to a little pump. The pump sucks out all of the drainage to expedite the healing process. The doctors and nurses have all raved that this can cut the healing time in half.
The doctor was very happy with the results of the second surgery as well. I have an appointment on Thursday to hopefully remove the splint and the wound vac and get back to some sort of normalcy. I am confidant that the process will continue to go in the direction we had initially anticipated and by Christmas of this year I will be free and clear of this nonsense forever. I am scheduled to go back to Dr. Buttar's clinic in the next month or so and get one last round of the AARSOTA shots as a precaution. He was concerned that any time you cut into something with cancer, it tends to spread. My immune system is back working properly so this will not be an issue but a worthwhile precaution to close out this process.
I will continue to update more in the near future. I have been in a lot of pain and taking a lot of pills ( which I tried to refuse until the pain came on) and have not felt much like typing. I appreciate all of the calls, e mails and texts. If I have not responded I apologize. These last few weeks have been difficult and talking has not been on the top of my list. I want to thank everyone who has been so helpful in the last few weeks. Lots of good food and love have come to the house and that has been a blessing. I want to thank all of my helpers, I am sure I have been a total pain in the ass and I sincerely appreciate all you have done!!!!!!!
Please take some of the information in the previous posts and put it to good use. This year has been totally crazy and I believe had I known what I know now I would not have had to have gone through all of this. Cancer is mostly preventable!!!!! Use the information wisely and don't let this happen to you. The crazy thing is the way I went is most likely much less physically taxing and probably much less painful than the traditional route and this has not been fun!!!!!
Thursday, October 14, 2010
ANOTHER CANCER LIE
I am dually pissed off about your doctor's ignorance on nutrition as well as the lies these large cancer organizations spread to raise money. I got an e mail from someone today trying to raise money for the Susan Komen raise to the cure. Honestly, I have not done a lot of research into their organization and cannot really comment about them as a whole. However, the e mail stated this in regards to breast cancer.....
Your breast health…
The greatest risk factors for breast cancer are being female and growing older. Breast cancer knows no boundary, be it age, gender, socio-economic status or geographic location. One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. That's one in eight within your company, school and organization!
The key to survival is early detection. Three simple steps for early detection are regular mammograms, clinical exams and breast self-exams. And, remember, breast cancer affects more than just the patient; friends and family need support too.
I assume this is the company line from the organization. This is a complete fucking lie!!!!!!!!!!! " The greatest risk factors for breast canccer are being female and growing older." What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The greatest risk for getting cancer is neither of these. Healthy women who stay away from toxic chemicals and poison, chemical laiden foods, drink clean water, exercise and have a healthy outlook on life do not get cancer. These organizations use fear to raise money. "If you are a women, you have a great chance of getting breast cancer, there is nothing you can do but hope you dont get it." This is a fear tactic which is obviously working wonderfully.
These organizations are often times fronts for the pharmaceutical and medical scanning industies to scare women into gettting unnecessary and often cancer causing procedures. They do nothing to educate the public on what causes cancer ( contrary to what they say, the causes of cancer are very evident) and how to protect yourself. All these organizations ever talk about is screenings, which are extremely profitable and often times expose women to unnecessary amounts of radiation( another cancer causer). Then, once the screenings find cancer, they push you to these " miracle" drugs that usually destroy any quality of life. Breast cancer is completely preventable, yet these organizations never promote this. Any organization that is not about proper education has some alterior motive. Educate yourself, stop listening to these bullshit fundraising giants talking about how they are so close to stamping out cancer. The way to stamp out cancer is to stop using poison products and force these large companies to stop making them.
Cancer will disappear when the public is educated enough to stop polluting their bodies and we force the big companies to stop polluting our water supplies. Do not sit back and be a victim and hope you dont get cancer. Being proactive is the only way to stamp out cancer, pumping billions of dollars to "charity" organizations has not, and will not work!!!!!!!!
I see these big cancer walks and see these women who are "survivors" and feel sickened knowing many of them will not survive more than five years. They are often uneducated to the devastating long term effects there treatment will have on them. They have not been educated to change the habits that put them there in the first place. Be very careful about which organizations you donate your time and money to. Many of them are wolves in sheeps clothing. The ACS being the worst of all!!!!
Your breast health…
The greatest risk factors for breast cancer are being female and growing older. Breast cancer knows no boundary, be it age, gender, socio-economic status or geographic location. One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. That's one in eight within your company, school and organization!
The key to survival is early detection. Three simple steps for early detection are regular mammograms, clinical exams and breast self-exams. And, remember, breast cancer affects more than just the patient; friends and family need support too.
I assume this is the company line from the organization. This is a complete fucking lie!!!!!!!!!!! " The greatest risk factors for breast canccer are being female and growing older." What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The greatest risk for getting cancer is neither of these. Healthy women who stay away from toxic chemicals and poison, chemical laiden foods, drink clean water, exercise and have a healthy outlook on life do not get cancer. These organizations use fear to raise money. "If you are a women, you have a great chance of getting breast cancer, there is nothing you can do but hope you dont get it." This is a fear tactic which is obviously working wonderfully.
These organizations are often times fronts for the pharmaceutical and medical scanning industies to scare women into gettting unnecessary and often cancer causing procedures. They do nothing to educate the public on what causes cancer ( contrary to what they say, the causes of cancer are very evident) and how to protect yourself. All these organizations ever talk about is screenings, which are extremely profitable and often times expose women to unnecessary amounts of radiation( another cancer causer). Then, once the screenings find cancer, they push you to these " miracle" drugs that usually destroy any quality of life. Breast cancer is completely preventable, yet these organizations never promote this. Any organization that is not about proper education has some alterior motive. Educate yourself, stop listening to these bullshit fundraising giants talking about how they are so close to stamping out cancer. The way to stamp out cancer is to stop using poison products and force these large companies to stop making them.
Cancer will disappear when the public is educated enough to stop polluting their bodies and we force the big companies to stop polluting our water supplies. Do not sit back and be a victim and hope you dont get cancer. Being proactive is the only way to stamp out cancer, pumping billions of dollars to "charity" organizations has not, and will not work!!!!!!!!
I see these big cancer walks and see these women who are "survivors" and feel sickened knowing many of them will not survive more than five years. They are often uneducated to the devastating long term effects there treatment will have on them. They have not been educated to change the habits that put them there in the first place. Be very careful about which organizations you donate your time and money to. Many of them are wolves in sheeps clothing. The ACS being the worst of all!!!!
IF YOUR DOCTOR TELLS YOU NUTRITION DOES NOT MATTER HE IS EITHER A COMPLETE FUCKING RETARD OR A LIAR!!!!!
I have to address a few things that have been bothering me lately. This cancer industry bullshit is really starting to piss me off! I often get e mails or phone calls from people who are looking to be steered in the right direction as far as treatment options and nutrition advice. I continue hearing the same story. Doctors telling their patients that what you eat has no effect on your outcome for cancer recovery. I was told this same thing by the original doctor I saw at the Cleveland Clinic. Many of the other patients at Dr. Buttar's office had the same experience with their previous doctors. I hear the same thing, " eat whatever you want, it does not matter". Your doctor is either a complete FUCKING RETARD OR A LIAR!!!!!! I don't know how else to say this. This blog is not meant to be politically correct and I do not care who I offend. If your doctor it telling you this for any ailment, especially cancer, run! He is obviously completely clueless to true health. Remember, doctors do not have any training in nutrition whatsoever. Some medical schools are required to take a basic intro class, most have no training whatsoever. This is a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Again, the pharmaceutical companies run most medical schools and purposely leave this information out. If the public knew cancer could be prevented and treated using healthy foods, they would be out of business. They should be out of business, they are the biggest crooks and scam artists on the planet!
Cancer does not start in the body because there is a lack of chemotherapy! Cancer starts because of poor nutrition and an overload of toxic chemicals in the body. These chemicals come from food, health care products, contaminated water, pharmaceutical drugs etc...... Why in the hell would a doctor treat an already poisoned person with more poison and expect to get positive results? He is either a fucking retard or is in the back pocket of the pharmaceutical companies. THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why would a doctor tell you to continue doing what you have done all your life that caused the cancer? Continue eating the poison you have all your life, it makes no difference! Where is the logic in that?
I recently bought a book called A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives. It is a great reference tool. I would advise everyone to buy this book. Go through your cupboards and take out your favorite foods and look up the ingredients. If you eat like most Americans do you, will be appalled at the garbage that is put in the food. Many of the ingredients in your mainstream shit food contain ingredients that are directly linked to cancer. This book will tell you exactly which ones do. Yet your doctor does not see how this would matter? RETARD OR LIAR!!!!!!!!!!
Often times your doctor is happy to poison you with chemo and radiation then tells you to go home and eat sugar, which cancer feeds on. You get poisoned by the doctor, then you get to go home and he gives you the go ahead to poison yourself. Brilliant!!!!! IF YOU HAVE CANCER, OR HAVE HAD CANCER IN THE PAST AND YOU WANT TO CONTINUE EXISTING ON THIS PLANET, CLEAN UP YOUR DIET IMMEDIATELY AND STOP USING TOXIC HEALTH AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cancer does not start in the body because there is a lack of chemotherapy! Cancer starts because of poor nutrition and an overload of toxic chemicals in the body. These chemicals come from food, health care products, contaminated water, pharmaceutical drugs etc...... Why in the hell would a doctor treat an already poisoned person with more poison and expect to get positive results? He is either a fucking retard or is in the back pocket of the pharmaceutical companies. THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why would a doctor tell you to continue doing what you have done all your life that caused the cancer? Continue eating the poison you have all your life, it makes no difference! Where is the logic in that?
I recently bought a book called A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives. It is a great reference tool. I would advise everyone to buy this book. Go through your cupboards and take out your favorite foods and look up the ingredients. If you eat like most Americans do you, will be appalled at the garbage that is put in the food. Many of the ingredients in your mainstream shit food contain ingredients that are directly linked to cancer. This book will tell you exactly which ones do. Yet your doctor does not see how this would matter? RETARD OR LIAR!!!!!!!!!!
Often times your doctor is happy to poison you with chemo and radiation then tells you to go home and eat sugar, which cancer feeds on. You get poisoned by the doctor, then you get to go home and he gives you the go ahead to poison yourself. Brilliant!!!!! IF YOU HAVE CANCER, OR HAVE HAD CANCER IN THE PAST AND YOU WANT TO CONTINUE EXISTING ON THIS PLANET, CLEAN UP YOUR DIET IMMEDIATELY AND STOP USING TOXIC HEALTH AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
STOP THE LIES, BREAST CANCER AWARENESS MONTH IS BULLSHIT
Here is a very interesting article from naturalnews.com today. It focuses on the insanity of the pink everything going on this month. It is a complete scam and it sickens me! I continue seeing new cancer patients at Dr. Buttar's office and hear the stories about the horrific effects of the unnecessary surgeries and chemotherapy they underwent before finally waking up to the fact that those treatments DO NOT WORK AND DESTROY THE BODY AND SPIRIT! Unfortunately, everyone reading this blog is or will be affected by cancer. Wake up, almost all types of cancers are preventable and treatable through non toxic means!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please pass along this information so this deadly scheme of lies stops now!!!!!!!!! Do not let any more oncologists and surgeons maim and kill your loved ones!
NaturalNews) Now that we're in the midst of "Breast Cancer Awareness Month" -- with all its pinkwashing nonsense at full tilt -- it brings up the question of why the month is named an "awareness" month. Why not name it "Breast Cancer Prevention Month?" The answer to that question, it turns out, reveals a number of interesting things about the cancer industry that the general public isn't supposed to know.
For starters, you're only supposed to be "aware" of breast cancer, but you're not supposed to actually prevent it. The whole point of this awareness month is not actually to increase awareness of breast cancer -- virtually everyone is already aware of the existence of the disease -- but rather to increase fear so that more women will go get screened for cancer. They should really call it the "Be Afraid of Breast Cancer Month."
The big push for more cancer screening, it turns out, only results in more recruitment of women into high-profit cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and surgery. This is where the real profits are to be found, and Breast Cancer Awareness Month is really all about corralling women into these high-profit treatments. The science, by the way, says that radiation, chemotherapy and surgery harm far more women than they help, and that cancer over-diagnosis and over-treatment is such a huge problem today that all these breast cancer awareness campaigns are actually hurting women's health across the board.
See these stories to learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/022917_c...
http://www.naturalnews.com/029839_m...
http://www.naturalnews.com/027526_S...
Why not prevent cancer?
So why doesn't the cancer industry rally women to prevent breast cancer every October? The answer is obvious: Preventing breast cancer would reduce the number of cancer patients being processed through their high-profit cancer centers. If women were to effectively prevent cancer by avoiding toxic chemicals, eating anti-cancer foods and boosting their intake of anti-cancer nutrients like vitamin D, cancer rates across America would plummet -- perhaps by as much as 80%.
And that, in turn, would hit the profits of the cancer industry hard, reducing both incomes as well as influence. Perhaps more frighteningly, preventing cancer would hammer the sales of products from companies that engage in pinkwashing campaigns. Pinkwashing -- which means introducing a "pink" version of your products in order to trick gullible consumers into buying your toxic stuff -- is now so common and profitable that all sorts of companies are using it to try to sell more stuff. You can now buy pinked-out handguns and alcohol, too, and they promise to donate a portion of proceed to fund breast cancer research.
But that's the real kicker in all this: We don't need any new research to prevent breast cancer. We already know how to prevent it right now! It's easy with vitamin D, exercise, fitness, superfoods and anti-cancer nutritional supplements such as medicinal mushrooms. Yet virtually the entire cancer industry actively ignores all these things. In fact, some organizations such as the American Cancer Society actually go out of their way to scare people aware from cancer cures, thereby resulting in more cancer. Just look at the ACS advertisements that try to make people afraid of sunlight! (They really just want to keep us all in the dark, both literally and figuratively.)
Why the cancer industry is terrified of knowledge
If the population really knew how to prevent cancer, the cancer industry would collapse within a generation. The cancer crooks know this, so they avoid mentioning vitamin D and anti-cancer nutrients. Just go to a "Walk for the Cure" cancer rally sometime and ask the officials there why they don't promote preventing breast cancer. Their answers will amaze you. They simply have no interest in preventing breast cancer. Their entire focus is treating breast cancer, which is a clever ploy for recruiting women into extremely toxic conventional cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. They absolutely do not want women to know how to prevent breast cancer because that would destroy their entire pinkwashing scam and put them all out of business.
Let's face it: Cancer is growing into a trillion-dollar industry worldwide. There's a ton of money to be made from keeping women nutritionally ignorant, scaring them into cancer screening, irradiating their breasts with mammograms, and then charging them huge dollars to "treat" their cancers. It's a highly profitable scam that exploits the bodies of women for corporate profits, and virtually all the cancer non-profits are on board with this criminal scam. Breast Cancer Action, out of San Francisco, is one of the rare exceptions to this. They actually fight against pinkwashing and encourage women to "Think before you pink!" See www.BCaction.org to learn more.
How the cancer industry exploits women three times
If you think about it, the cancer industry actually exploits women three times in a row:
First, they exploit women by giving them cancer through the false promise of annual mammograms. These have already been shown to be a source of cancer-causing radiation that are more effective at harming women than helping them.
Secondly, once they've given women cancer through mammograms, they charge them money to poison them with chemotherapy, radiation or surgery. This leaves women scarred and suffering from permanent brain damage (http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html) and kidney damage.
Thirdly, after they've given women cancer and then poisoned them, if those women are still alive they label them "cancer survivors" and ask them to donate more money to "find a cure." This is all completely hogwash quackery. The women who survive chemotherapy are actually chemo survivors, and the best way to help other women is not to repeat the same inhumane cycle of disease screening and medical poisoning but rather to teach women how to PREVENT breast cancer. That is the compassionate, ethical and practical way to help more women avoid the pain and suffering that goes with this entirely preventable disease.
The cancer industry is dominated by male cancer doctors, by the way, and it is no exaggeration to say that they exploit women's bodies for profit while causing indescribable pain, suffering and death among innocent female victims through their toxic and barbaric cancer "treatments." The entire operation is wildly criminal and inhumane.
Breast cancer is anywhere from 70% - 90% preventable through simple changes in diet, exercise, consumer product use and nutritional supplementation. I believe that the information found here on NaturalNews.com could result in a 90% reduction in breast cancer if these truths were known to and embraced by the general public. But the NIH and ACS won't tell women the truth about cancer. Neither will the cancer non-profits, nor conventional doctors and health authorities. Even the U.S. government is censoring truthful information about natural cancer cures that really work by threatening natural product and nutritional supplement companies with armed raids if they dare tell women the truth about the anti-cancer properties of their products.
What we really have in America today is a conspiracy against women, erected and operated via collusion between Big Government and Big Pharma, both of which benefit when women are sick, frail, afraid and desperate. A woman who can be scared into chemotherapy is easy to exploit for profit by a predatory cancer industry that puts profits first and human compassion last.
I feel extremely sad for those women who are being victimized by the cancer industry. There's no telling how many are maimed or killed each year by toxic cancer treatments which are entirely unnecessary. I have no doubt that in the future, this era of barbaric cancer treatments will be looked upon with total outrage by women, in much the same way that African Americans today look upon the era of plantation slavery throughout North and South America.
What the cancer industry is doing to women today is much the same as what many slave owners did to their slaves a few centuries ago: Exploiting their bodies for profit while causing immeasurable pain and suffering. It's no coincidence, by the way, that the greatest breast cancer profits generated today by the cancer industry come from black women. The cancer industry won't dare tell them that they're all vitamin D deficient and that's why their cancer is far worse than white women's cancer! See my video for the shocking details: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=5A62F...
Slavery still exists, you see. It has just been reframed as "medicine." Having your breasts irradiated is much like a slave being hobbled with a wood axe to make sure they can't escape. Mammograms make sure you can't escape the cancer industry, and medical propaganda is used to make sure that your mind is enslaved as well as your body.
Real freedom from breast cancer can only be attained if you de-program yourself from the cancer industry propaganda and heal yourself by choosing to live an anti-cancer lifestyle. That's what we teach here at NaturalNews: Freedom, health and personal responsibility. We fight against the medical enslavement of women, and we take a firm stand against the exploitation of women by the corrupt, criminally-operated cancer industry
NaturalNews) Now that we're in the midst of "Breast Cancer Awareness Month" -- with all its pinkwashing nonsense at full tilt -- it brings up the question of why the month is named an "awareness" month. Why not name it "Breast Cancer Prevention Month?" The answer to that question, it turns out, reveals a number of interesting things about the cancer industry that the general public isn't supposed to know.
For starters, you're only supposed to be "aware" of breast cancer, but you're not supposed to actually prevent it. The whole point of this awareness month is not actually to increase awareness of breast cancer -- virtually everyone is already aware of the existence of the disease -- but rather to increase fear so that more women will go get screened for cancer. They should really call it the "Be Afraid of Breast Cancer Month."
The big push for more cancer screening, it turns out, only results in more recruitment of women into high-profit cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and surgery. This is where the real profits are to be found, and Breast Cancer Awareness Month is really all about corralling women into these high-profit treatments. The science, by the way, says that radiation, chemotherapy and surgery harm far more women than they help, and that cancer over-diagnosis and over-treatment is such a huge problem today that all these breast cancer awareness campaigns are actually hurting women's health across the board.
See these stories to learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/022917_c...
http://www.naturalnews.com/029839_m...
http://www.naturalnews.com/027526_S...
Why not prevent cancer?
So why doesn't the cancer industry rally women to prevent breast cancer every October? The answer is obvious: Preventing breast cancer would reduce the number of cancer patients being processed through their high-profit cancer centers. If women were to effectively prevent cancer by avoiding toxic chemicals, eating anti-cancer foods and boosting their intake of anti-cancer nutrients like vitamin D, cancer rates across America would plummet -- perhaps by as much as 80%.
And that, in turn, would hit the profits of the cancer industry hard, reducing both incomes as well as influence. Perhaps more frighteningly, preventing cancer would hammer the sales of products from companies that engage in pinkwashing campaigns. Pinkwashing -- which means introducing a "pink" version of your products in order to trick gullible consumers into buying your toxic stuff -- is now so common and profitable that all sorts of companies are using it to try to sell more stuff. You can now buy pinked-out handguns and alcohol, too, and they promise to donate a portion of proceed to fund breast cancer research.
But that's the real kicker in all this: We don't need any new research to prevent breast cancer. We already know how to prevent it right now! It's easy with vitamin D, exercise, fitness, superfoods and anti-cancer nutritional supplements such as medicinal mushrooms. Yet virtually the entire cancer industry actively ignores all these things. In fact, some organizations such as the American Cancer Society actually go out of their way to scare people aware from cancer cures, thereby resulting in more cancer. Just look at the ACS advertisements that try to make people afraid of sunlight! (They really just want to keep us all in the dark, both literally and figuratively.)
Why the cancer industry is terrified of knowledge
If the population really knew how to prevent cancer, the cancer industry would collapse within a generation. The cancer crooks know this, so they avoid mentioning vitamin D and anti-cancer nutrients. Just go to a "Walk for the Cure" cancer rally sometime and ask the officials there why they don't promote preventing breast cancer. Their answers will amaze you. They simply have no interest in preventing breast cancer. Their entire focus is treating breast cancer, which is a clever ploy for recruiting women into extremely toxic conventional cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. They absolutely do not want women to know how to prevent breast cancer because that would destroy their entire pinkwashing scam and put them all out of business.
Let's face it: Cancer is growing into a trillion-dollar industry worldwide. There's a ton of money to be made from keeping women nutritionally ignorant, scaring them into cancer screening, irradiating their breasts with mammograms, and then charging them huge dollars to "treat" their cancers. It's a highly profitable scam that exploits the bodies of women for corporate profits, and virtually all the cancer non-profits are on board with this criminal scam. Breast Cancer Action, out of San Francisco, is one of the rare exceptions to this. They actually fight against pinkwashing and encourage women to "Think before you pink!" See www.BCaction.org to learn more.
How the cancer industry exploits women three times
If you think about it, the cancer industry actually exploits women three times in a row:
First, they exploit women by giving them cancer through the false promise of annual mammograms. These have already been shown to be a source of cancer-causing radiation that are more effective at harming women than helping them.
Secondly, once they've given women cancer through mammograms, they charge them money to poison them with chemotherapy, radiation or surgery. This leaves women scarred and suffering from permanent brain damage (http://www.naturalnews.com/020665.html) and kidney damage.
Thirdly, after they've given women cancer and then poisoned them, if those women are still alive they label them "cancer survivors" and ask them to donate more money to "find a cure." This is all completely hogwash quackery. The women who survive chemotherapy are actually chemo survivors, and the best way to help other women is not to repeat the same inhumane cycle of disease screening and medical poisoning but rather to teach women how to PREVENT breast cancer. That is the compassionate, ethical and practical way to help more women avoid the pain and suffering that goes with this entirely preventable disease.
The cancer industry is dominated by male cancer doctors, by the way, and it is no exaggeration to say that they exploit women's bodies for profit while causing indescribable pain, suffering and death among innocent female victims through their toxic and barbaric cancer "treatments." The entire operation is wildly criminal and inhumane.
Breast cancer is anywhere from 70% - 90% preventable through simple changes in diet, exercise, consumer product use and nutritional supplementation. I believe that the information found here on NaturalNews.com could result in a 90% reduction in breast cancer if these truths were known to and embraced by the general public. But the NIH and ACS won't tell women the truth about cancer. Neither will the cancer non-profits, nor conventional doctors and health authorities. Even the U.S. government is censoring truthful information about natural cancer cures that really work by threatening natural product and nutritional supplement companies with armed raids if they dare tell women the truth about the anti-cancer properties of their products.
What we really have in America today is a conspiracy against women, erected and operated via collusion between Big Government and Big Pharma, both of which benefit when women are sick, frail, afraid and desperate. A woman who can be scared into chemotherapy is easy to exploit for profit by a predatory cancer industry that puts profits first and human compassion last.
I feel extremely sad for those women who are being victimized by the cancer industry. There's no telling how many are maimed or killed each year by toxic cancer treatments which are entirely unnecessary. I have no doubt that in the future, this era of barbaric cancer treatments will be looked upon with total outrage by women, in much the same way that African Americans today look upon the era of plantation slavery throughout North and South America.
What the cancer industry is doing to women today is much the same as what many slave owners did to their slaves a few centuries ago: Exploiting their bodies for profit while causing immeasurable pain and suffering. It's no coincidence, by the way, that the greatest breast cancer profits generated today by the cancer industry come from black women. The cancer industry won't dare tell them that they're all vitamin D deficient and that's why their cancer is far worse than white women's cancer! See my video for the shocking details: http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=5A62F...
Slavery still exists, you see. It has just been reframed as "medicine." Having your breasts irradiated is much like a slave being hobbled with a wood axe to make sure they can't escape. Mammograms make sure you can't escape the cancer industry, and medical propaganda is used to make sure that your mind is enslaved as well as your body.
Real freedom from breast cancer can only be attained if you de-program yourself from the cancer industry propaganda and heal yourself by choosing to live an anti-cancer lifestyle. That's what we teach here at NaturalNews: Freedom, health and personal responsibility. We fight against the medical enslavement of women, and we take a firm stand against the exploitation of women by the corrupt, criminally-operated cancer industry
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)