Friday, December 10, 2010

Dr. Buttar's Blog

There is some great health and wellness information in Dr. Buttar's blog. Check it out!


The article below came from Health Optimization and Wellness report which comes from Dr. Buttar's office. It provides a good explanation of why the masses are continually poisoned by mainstream cancer treatments.

Alternative Versus Traditional Cancer Treatments
by Joni Bell

The reason alternative cancer treatments are not more widely known has little to do with their alleged therapeutic ineffectiveness and far more to do with political control and the therapy marketplace.

Many of the treatments are on the “unproven methods of cancer management” list maintained by the American Cancer Society which is, effectively, a “blacklist”.

Medical doctors will know little if anything at all about alternative cancer treatments for a number of reasons.

Medical schools don’t teach alternative treatments and medical journals rarely contain articles about alternative treatments. Medical journals are published for the allopathic establishment, and they are mostly financed by advertisements from pharmaceutical companies. Doctors receive a lot of negative information about alternative treatments from the American Medical Association (AMA) and the pharmaceutical industry.

Internet “Quackwatches” and so forth decry alternative therapies even when there is contradictory evidence to their effectiveness plus their state medical boards may fine them heavily, suspend their license to practice or even revoke it.

The American Cancer Society (ACS), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and other Government cancer bodies will not investigate or promote alternative treatments. If your doctor prescribes treatments that are not FDA approved, he or she can be sued or lose their license. A medical doctor can only prescribe treatments that are Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved. Their state medical boards may fine them heavily, suspend their license to practice or even revoke it.

The federal government can close them down and confiscate their property and they may lose their right to see patients in hospitals not to mention other doctors/peers openly ridicule and criticize them. It is no wonder your doctor will not know or tell you about alternative cancer treatments, because they could literally lose everything they have and worked for their whole lives.

There are many alternative treatments for cancer that will not provide Big Pharma a single penny of revenue, much less profits. This means these same treatments will not provide the media with a single penny of revenue. Guess which treatments the media pushes?

There is a war going on in medicine today; a war between orthodox medicine and alternative medicine. The war is being fought with money and information. The war is to control what you know, and don’t know, about cancer treatments. When a new discovery is made, it comes down to the profitablity. If there is no profit, the treatment is buried.

Find a natural substance that cures something, bury this fact, then fabricate, synthesize, and mutate the key natural substance, then patent the mutation, and make huge profits.

That is why there is “no scientific evidence” for alternative treatments, no one is looking, because they cannot be patented and thus are not profitable enough. The reason there is no official “scientific evidence” for alternative cancer treatments and cancer prevention treatments is that they are not highly profitable to Big Pharma. It is impossible, by law, for a substance to be considered to have “scientific evidence” unless Big Pharma submits it to the FDA, and they will only submit things that are very, very profitable to them.

To the cancer establishment, a cancer patient is a profit center. The actual clinical and scientific evidence does not support the claims of the cancer industry. Conventional cancer treatments are in place as the law of the land because they pay, not heal, the best. Decades of the politics-of-cancer-as-usual have kept you from knowing this, and will continue to do so unless we wake up to their reality.

Joni Bell has many years of extensive study in the area of natural cancer prevention and treatment. He has numerous success stories of people being diagnosed living cancer free with use of alternative methods

Monday, December 6, 2010


The last 6 or 7 weeks have been difficult but things are definitely looking up. The wounds from the previous two surgeries are starting to heal up nicely. The former melanoma sight is actually starting to look like skin. Although it still probably has a few weeks to heal, it actually looks like it may look like a leg again at some point. I have been up and walking for a little over a week now, slowly improving daily. Today was the first day I was able to exercise since the day of the first surgery, October 18. Long time for me!

The plan was to come back to Charlotte and finish up what was hopefully the last month of treatments. The melanoma was successfully removed, but there was concern about the cancer possibly spreading from the surgery, especially since the immune system can be weakened during surgery and from time spent in the hospital. I started back at Dr. Buttar's office last Tuesday. I was feeling very run down this time last week. I had been stuck on bed rest for almost 6 weeks, 2 surgeries did a number on me as well as being stuck on painkillers I wanted no part of for 2 or 3 weeks. After Tuesday at Buttar's I felt much better. The IV treatments did wonders for me. I was surprised at how quickly my energy levels came back. Unbelievable stuff! I was given the first of the final AARSOTA shot last Tuesday. The doctor and I talked about this previously and he decided it was best to go ahead with the round of shots although I thought they were unnecessary( probably because I was feeling so run down, a large needle in the ass and possible reaction were not all that appealing at the time). His rational was that if things had spread, they would be relatively small and weak and now would be the time to turn up the immune system on high alert and get rid of it once and for all. He said that if I had no reaction to the AARSOTA shot that meant there was nothing for the immune system to fight, meaning that there is not a hint of cancer left in the my body.

I had no reaction whatsoever! Great news!! I knew in my heart that after the surgery was performed that any trace of cancer was gone, although it was nice to have it confirmed by the doctor!

The plan is to go two days per week for the next three weeks to finish up the last 3 AARSOTA shots then be done. Possibly a maintenance program every two weeks to once every month for a little while to keep the body in good working order. By Christmas I should be done with all of this once and for all!!!!!!

A little side not to this story. I was at home last weekend packing up to come down to Charlotte to start treatment again. Nurse Johnna came up to drive me back to Charlotte and was staying the weekend. She was looking through the book shelves in my dad's living room and pulled the book ANATOMY OF THE SPIRIT the Seven Stages of Power and Healing by Caroline Miss from the shelf. Johnna commented what a great book it was and asked me dad whose it was. He told us that it was my mothers book. I swear I have looked through this bookshelf literally hundreds of times and never saw this book. These particular shelves are not that big. This is a book I would have remembered seeing. At the time it was no big deal, but I decided to take it back to Charlotte and read it while at Dr. Buttar's office. I get back to Buttar's and started reading it. (It is a fantastic book and I would recommend anyone reading it, especially if faced with some type of illness.)

I am reading the book on Tuesday and I notice that there are scribbled lines throughout the book. I paged through the book and noticed them throughout, often times at parts that seemed relevant to what I was going through at the moment. I wasn't sure where these lines had come from. It looked like a young child or someone very drunk was doing the underlining. It struck my as very strange, but I forgot about it until the next day when I was back reading at Buttar's office. I was getting the AARSOTA shot that day and was a bit nervous. This was really a make or break day for me. If I had no reaction to the shot, I was done, if there were some sort of reaction I may have to continue treatments. It was a bit of a stressful day for me. I began reading again and it dawned on me where the scribbles had come from. My mother had been reading this book some 10-12 years ago while she was going through cancer treatments as well. (For those of you who don't know the story of my mother, the lines were scribbled because she had brain surgery and lost some of the function of her writing hand. She had trouble writing amongst other things, but she never gave up on anything!) It hit me like a ton of bricks, she was reading the very same material I was at that critical moment in my life more than a decade ago and the message in the book could not have been more fitting. After the initial shock and sadness thinking about her not being around, I felt an overwhelming sense of calm I have never felt in my life. I knew at that moment, that the cancer was gone for good. Before she died she told all of us she would be with us always, I could not think of a moment I needed her more and she responded. Truly amazing!!!!! The events that lead me to seek out a better way than the outdated, barbaric cancer treatment mostly available today seem like a bizarre series of very random events, although I know better. Things really do happen for a reason!!!!!!

These are two of the sentences she had underlined more than a decade ago.

" Release the need to know why things happen as they do, and to trust that whatever the reason is, it is a part of a grander spiritual design."

"Let me know what I am able to know and trust that behind all events, no matter how painful, there is a reason from which all good can come"
This may seem like a coincidence to some, a miracle to others. The piece of mind and the connection I felt to my mother at that point was truly amazing. I felt she was sitting next to me letting me know life is just beginning!

Monday, November 15, 2010


Cell phone radiation is a fairly new thing in today's modern world. Today, everyone has a cell phone, young children included. I don't think we will truly know the effects for another ten or twenty years. Until then, it is better to be on the safe side.

Anything that emits radiation is potentially dangerous and therefore should be handled with care. Cell phones are no different. I am sure the cell phone industry is doing their best to spread lies and misinformation about the potential dangers. Common sense tells me that holding a cell phone that emits radiation that close to the brain is bound to cause problems. This list may be helpful to limit radiation exposure as much as possible.

EWG’s Guide to Reduce Cell Phone Radiation Exposure

Cell phones emit radiation to send voice and text messages to the other caller. Health risks aren’t confirmed, but some (not all) studies of frequent cell phone users suggest increased risks for brain and mouth tumors and children’s behavior problems.

To be on the safe side, follow the tips below to reduce exposures.

Look up your phone on EWG’s buyer’s guide. (Your phone's model number may be printed under your battery.) Consider replacing your phone with one that emits the lowest radiation possible and still meets your needs.

Headsets emit much less radiation than phones. Choose either wired or wireless (experts are split on which version is safer) using our cell phone headset guide. Some wireless headsets emit continuous, low-level radiation, so take yours off your ear when you're not on a call. Using your phone in speaker mode also reduces radiation to the head.

Your phone emits radiation when you talk or text, but not when you're receiving messages. Listening more and talking less reduces your exposures.

Hold the phone away from your torso when you're talking (with headset or speaker), not against your ear, in a pocket, or on your belt where soft body tissues absorb radiation.

Phones use less power (less radiation) to send text than voice. And unlike when you speak with the phone at your ear, texting keeps radiation away from your head.

Fewer signal bars on your phone means that it emits more radiation to get the signal to the tower. Make and take calls when your phone has a strong signal.

Young children’s brains absorb twice the cell phone radiation as an adult’s. EWG joins health agencies in at least 6 countries in recommending limits for children’s phone use, such as for emergency situations only.

Radiation shields such as antenna caps or keypad covers reduce the connection quality and force the phone to transmit at a higher power with higher radiation


The link above is the Environmental Working Group's data on pesticides on fruits and vegetables consumed in this country. I have provided other lists similar but this is by far the most comprehensive list I have seen. This is the most thorough chart in regards to the number of pesticides used per fruit/vegetable, how many pesticides were used on the entire commodity, pesticides in parts per million found on the fruit/ vegetable etc...

This list is insane! Celery was found to have the most pesticides used. The samples tested were found to have 13 different pesticides. Eating 13 different pesticides is suicide. Many pesticides tested on their own have been linked to many health problems in humans. However, it is nearly impossible for anyone to tell the harmful effects of mixing 13 different pesticides and the danger it poses to the human body.

Strawberries and peaches were also amongst the fruits and veggies with the highest pesticide content. Stay away from all non organic fruits and veggies that are high on the list at all cost. Eating these is like sprinkling rat poison on your food before eating to add flavor.( 13 different rat poisons for some tested) Fruits and vegetables with the lowest amount of pesticides are asparagus and onions. This is a useful list to use when choosing to buy organic or non organic. Obviously buying organic as much as possible is ideal. This list includes all NON organic fruits and vegetables. These pesticides are not found on organic crops. Pass this list along. I often hear the arguement that organic foods are much more expensive and not worth the price. Prevention is much cheaper than treatment for serious disease!

Sunday, November 14, 2010

OPT OUT OF BODY SCANNERS AT AIRPORTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Many of you will be flying over the next month for the holidays. Some will be flying multiple times and I believe it is important to know the new health dangers at airports. Many of you have probably read in the news about the new TSA body scanners now being used at most major airports. There is a lot of controversy surrounding these devices. The machines expose you to very high levels of concentrated radiation which we already know is a major cause of cancer. Not to mention these machines seem to be very invasive. Do some research and make your own decision as to whether you want to walk through them. You have the option to opt out of it and be groped by a TSA agent instead. Many of the major airlines as well as pilot unions have urged their pilots to opt out of these because of the exposure to radiation. I would advise all of you to follow suit. Below is part of an article from the website talking about the dangers of the devices.

Airport body scanners could lead to an increase in skin cancers according to scientists at Columbia University, who warn that the dose emitted by the naked x-ray devices could be up to 20 times higher than originally estimated, in another clear example of how the scanners are completely illegal, dangerous to public health, and need to be removed immediately.

Dr David Brenner, head of Columbia University’s centre for radiological research, warns that children and people with gene mutations whose bodies are less able to repair damage to their DNA are most at risk.

“If all 800 million people who use airports every year were screened with X-rays then the very small individual risk multiplied by the large number of screened people might imply a potential public health or societal risk. The population risk has the potential to be significant,” said Brenner.

Brenner’s research shows that the scanners will likely contribute to an increase in a common type of skin cancer called basal cell carcinoma which affects the head and neck.

“If there are increases in cancers as a result of irradiation of children, they would most likely appear some decades in the future. It would be prudent not to scan the head and neck,” added Brenner.

Brenner has urged medical authorities to look at his work, pointing to the dangerous notion of mass scanning millions of people without proper oversight.

“There really is no other technology around where we’re planning to X-ray such an enormous number of individuals. It’s really unprecedented in the radiation world,” said Brenner.

Similar concerns to those explored in the Columbia University study were voiced back in February by the influential Inter-Agency Committee on Radiation Safety, who warned in a report that the scanners increase the risk of cancer and birth defects and should not be used on pregnant women or children.

Despite governments claiming that backscatter x-ray systems produce radiation too low to pose a threat, the organization concluded in their report that governments must justify the use of the scanners and that a more accurate assessment of the health risks is needed.

Pregnant women and children should not be subject to scanning, according to the report, adding that governments should consider “other techniques to achieve the same end without the use of ionizing radiation.”

“The Committee cited the IAEA’s 1996 Basic Safety Standards agreement, drafted over three decades, that protects people from radiation. Frequent exposure to low doses of radiation can lead to cancer and birth defects, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,” reported Bloomberg.

In the United States, people can refuse the body scanner and opt for an aggressive and intrusive hand-search, but people traveling out of the UK and other areas of Europe don’t even get the choice – they are forced to go through the scanner if asked and cannot refuse or they are banned from traveling. Despite the media reporting universal acceptance of the scanners, in reality 600 formal complaints had been made about the devices in the first two months of their usage alone.

The alarming health concerns surrounding body scanners have been equaled by the shaky legality of the devices. In the UK, the scanners break child porn laws which forbid the production of indecent images of children, but the UK transport authorities have broken the law and mandated that children be required to pass through the machines.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) also wrote a letter to the UK government warning that the scanners broke privacy laws.

As we have highlighted, not only do the body scanners pose health risks but they also violate the fundamental human right of the innocent to be protected against strip-searches.

Despite official denials that the images produced by the devices show details of genitalia, journalists who have investigated trials of the technology have reported that details of sexual organs are “eerily visible”.

Indeed, as we have previously highlighted, when the scanners were first introduced at Australian airports in 2008 it was admitted that the X-ray backscatter devices don’t work properly unless the genitals of people going through them are visible. “It will show the private parts of people, but what we’ve decided is that we’re not going to blur those out, because it severely limits the detection capabilities,” said Melbourne Airport’s Office of Transport Security manager Cheryl Johnson.

Attempts to keep this under wraps by lying about the images produced are an effort to head off challenges to the legality of the devices. Historically, civil lawsuits where an individual has been strip searched by a member of the opposite sex have proven to be successful in North America.

Courts have consistently found that strip searches are only legal when performed on a person who has already been found guilty of a crime or on arrestees pending trial where a reasonable suspicion has to exist that they are carrying a weapon. Subjecting masses of people to blanket strip searches in airports reverses the very notion of innocent until proven guilty.

Barring people from flying and essentially treating them like terrorists for refusing to be humiliated by the virtual strip search is a clear breach of the basic human right of freedom of movement.

Several examples of airport security staff abusing the use of the devices have already come to light since their introduction earlier this year.

Indian film star Shahrukh Khan told a BBC talk show that naked images of his body from the scanner were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London. Heathrow denied the claim but Khan himself never retracted the story, and had no apparent motive for making it up.

Heathrow authorities were unable to deny a later example of the scanners being abused, when it emerged that a Heathrow worker had perved over a naked image of a female colleague after she passed through one of the devices, before commenting, “I love those gigantic tits”.

Jo Margetson, 29, reported John Laker, 25, to the police after she had entered the x-ray machine by mistake and Laker took the image before making lewd comments.

In Miami, a TSA worker in Miami attacked a colleague who had made fun of his small penis after he passed through a scanner device. The story again emphasized the fact that authorities were brazenly lying in claiming that the images produced by the devices did not show intimate details of genitalia.

Tuesday, November 2, 2010


It is time for an update, its been a little while. I am in the process of recovering from the two surgeries in the last few weeks. The first surgery was to remove the large legion on my leg. The surgery was done by Dr. J Raj who is the chief of plastic surgery at Fairview Hospital. The melanoma site was completely walled off to the rest of my body just as Dr. Buttar had predicted. There was no spreading to any other parts of the leg. Dr. Raj was initially concerned that the tumor had grown onto the tendon of my leg and that could pose a major problem. This was not the case, the surgeon said it could not have gone any better.

The surgery went well, although a much larger chunk of skin was taken than I had anticipated. I had a hole in my leg the size of a softball for about a week. Extremely painful!!!! Dr, Raj told me had I gone through the "traditional" treatment the area would have been at least twice the size. Having an open wound for a week on that part of your body was some of the worst pain I had ever experienced in my life!

After about a week of the wound being open, Dr. Raj went back in and performed a skin graph. The donor site was taken from my right thigh. The doctor compared the graph to a cheese grader. The skin that is taken off of the leg is so thin you can see through it if held up to a light. The wound from the donor site is a 5 by 10 inch rectangle which has a thin piece of gauze as dressing to cover it up and that is it. My right leg where the graph was given is in a half cast just below my knee. I have been totally immobilized since last Wednesday. I was instructed to not move at all. The graphed area is wrapped in a cast, as well as hooked up to a wound vac. The wound vac is a sponge attached to the wound with a tube connected to a little pump. The pump sucks out all of the drainage to expedite the healing process. The doctors and nurses have all raved that this can cut the healing time in half.

The doctor was very happy with the results of the second surgery as well. I have an appointment on Thursday to hopefully remove the splint and the wound vac and get back to some sort of normalcy. I am confidant that the process will continue to go in the direction we had initially anticipated and by Christmas of this year I will be free and clear of this nonsense forever. I am scheduled to go back to Dr. Buttar's clinic in the next month or so and get one last round of the AARSOTA shots as a precaution. He was concerned that any time you cut into something with cancer, it tends to spread. My immune system is back working properly so this will not be an issue but a worthwhile precaution to close out this process.

I will continue to update more in the near future. I have been in a lot of pain and taking a lot of pills ( which I tried to refuse until the pain came on) and have not felt much like typing. I appreciate all of the calls, e mails and texts. If I have not responded I apologize. These last few weeks have been difficult and talking has not been on the top of my list. I want to thank everyone who has been so helpful in the last few weeks. Lots of good food and love have come to the house and that has been a blessing. I want to thank all of my helpers, I am sure I have been a total pain in the ass and I sincerely appreciate all you have done!!!!!!!

Please take some of the information in the previous posts and put it to good use. This year has been totally crazy and I believe had I known what I know now I would not have had to have gone through all of this. Cancer is mostly preventable!!!!! Use the information wisely and don't let this happen to you. The crazy thing is the way I went is most likely much less physically taxing and probably much less painful than the traditional route and this has not been fun!!!!!

Thursday, October 14, 2010


I am dually pissed off about your doctor's ignorance on nutrition as well as the lies these large cancer organizations spread to raise money. I got an e mail from someone today trying to raise money for the Susan Komen raise to the cure. Honestly, I have not done a lot of research into their organization and cannot really comment about them as a whole. However, the e mail stated this in regards to breast cancer.....

Your breast health…
The greatest risk factors for breast cancer are being female and growing older. Breast cancer knows no boundary, be it age, gender, socio-economic status or geographic location. One in eight women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. That's one in eight within your company, school and organization!

The key to survival is early detection. Three simple steps for early detection are regular mammograms, clinical exams and breast self-exams. And, remember, breast cancer affects more than just the patient; friends and family need support too.

I assume this is the company line from the organization. This is a complete fucking lie!!!!!!!!!!! " The greatest risk factors for breast canccer are being female and growing older." What a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The greatest risk for getting cancer is neither of these. Healthy women who stay away from toxic chemicals and poison, chemical laiden foods, drink clean water, exercise and have a healthy outlook on life do not get cancer. These organizations use fear to raise money. "If you are a women, you have a great chance of getting breast cancer, there is nothing you can do but hope you dont get it." This is a fear tactic which is obviously working wonderfully.

These organizations are often times fronts for the pharmaceutical and medical scanning industies to scare women into gettting unnecessary and often cancer causing procedures. They do nothing to educate the public on what causes cancer ( contrary to what they say, the causes of cancer are very evident) and how to protect yourself. All these organizations ever talk about is screenings, which are extremely profitable and often times expose women to unnecessary amounts of radiation( another cancer causer). Then, once the screenings find cancer, they push you to these " miracle" drugs that usually destroy any quality of life. Breast cancer is completely preventable, yet these organizations never promote this. Any organization that is not about proper education has some alterior motive. Educate yourself, stop listening to these bullshit fundraising giants talking about how they are so close to stamping out cancer. The way to stamp out cancer is to stop using poison products and force these large companies to stop making them.

Cancer will disappear when the public is educated enough to stop polluting their bodies and we force the big companies to stop polluting our water supplies. Do not sit back and be a victim and hope you dont get cancer. Being proactive is the only way to stamp out cancer, pumping billions of dollars to "charity" organizations has not, and will not work!!!!!!!!

I see these big cancer walks and see these women who are "survivors" and feel sickened knowing many of them will not survive more than five years. They are often uneducated to the devastating long term effects there treatment will have on them. They have not been educated to change the habits that put them there in the first place. Be very careful about which organizations you donate your time and money to. Many of them are wolves in sheeps clothing. The ACS being the worst of all!!!!


I have to address a few things that have been bothering me lately. This cancer industry bullshit is really starting to piss me off! I often get e mails or phone calls from people who are looking to be steered in the right direction as far as treatment options and nutrition advice. I continue hearing the same story. Doctors telling their patients that what you eat has no effect on your outcome for cancer recovery. I was told this same thing by the original doctor I saw at the Cleveland Clinic. Many of the other patients at Dr. Buttar's office had the same experience with their previous doctors. I hear the same thing, " eat whatever you want, it does not matter". Your doctor is either a complete FUCKING RETARD OR A LIAR!!!!!! I don't know how else to say this. This blog is not meant to be politically correct and I do not care who I offend. If your doctor it telling you this for any ailment, especially cancer, run! He is obviously completely clueless to true health. Remember, doctors do not have any training in nutrition whatsoever. Some medical schools are required to take a basic intro class, most have no training whatsoever. This is a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Again, the pharmaceutical companies run most medical schools and purposely leave this information out. If the public knew cancer could be prevented and treated using healthy foods, they would be out of business. They should be out of business, they are the biggest crooks and scam artists on the planet!

Cancer does not start in the body because there is a lack of chemotherapy! Cancer starts because of poor nutrition and an overload of toxic chemicals in the body. These chemicals come from food, health care products, contaminated water, pharmaceutical drugs etc...... Why in the hell would a doctor treat an already poisoned person with more poison and expect to get positive results? He is either a fucking retard or is in the back pocket of the pharmaceutical companies. THERE IS NO OTHER OPTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why would a doctor tell you to continue doing what you have done all your life that caused the cancer? Continue eating the poison you have all your life, it makes no difference! Where is the logic in that?

I recently bought a book called A Consumer's Dictionary of Food Additives. It is a great reference tool. I would advise everyone to buy this book. Go through your cupboards and take out your favorite foods and look up the ingredients. If you eat like most Americans do you, will be appalled at the garbage that is put in the food. Many of the ingredients in your mainstream shit food contain ingredients that are directly linked to cancer. This book will tell you exactly which ones do. Yet your doctor does not see how this would matter? RETARD OR LIAR!!!!!!!!!!

Often times your doctor is happy to poison you with chemo and radiation then tells you to go home and eat sugar, which cancer feeds on. You get poisoned by the doctor, then you get to go home and he gives you the go ahead to poison yourself. Brilliant!!!!! IF YOU HAVE CANCER, OR HAVE HAD CANCER IN THE PAST AND YOU WANT TO CONTINUE EXISTING ON THIS PLANET, CLEAN UP YOUR DIET IMMEDIATELY AND STOP USING TOXIC HEALTH AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tuesday, October 12, 2010


Here is a very interesting article from today. It focuses on the insanity of the pink everything going on this month. It is a complete scam and it sickens me! I continue seeing new cancer patients at Dr. Buttar's office and hear the stories about the horrific effects of the unnecessary surgeries and chemotherapy they underwent before finally waking up to the fact that those treatments DO NOT WORK AND DESTROY THE BODY AND SPIRIT! Unfortunately, everyone reading this blog is or will be affected by cancer. Wake up, almost all types of cancers are preventable and treatable through non toxic means!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please pass along this information so this deadly scheme of lies stops now!!!!!!!!! Do not let any more oncologists and surgeons maim and kill your loved ones!

NaturalNews) Now that we're in the midst of "Breast Cancer Awareness Month" -- with all its pinkwashing nonsense at full tilt -- it brings up the question of why the month is named an "awareness" month. Why not name it "Breast Cancer Prevention Month?" The answer to that question, it turns out, reveals a number of interesting things about the cancer industry that the general public isn't supposed to know.

For starters, you're only supposed to be "aware" of breast cancer, but you're not supposed to actually prevent it. The whole point of this awareness month is not actually to increase awareness of breast cancer -- virtually everyone is already aware of the existence of the disease -- but rather to increase fear so that more women will go get screened for cancer. They should really call it the "Be Afraid of Breast Cancer Month."

The big push for more cancer screening, it turns out, only results in more recruitment of women into high-profit cancer therapies such as chemotherapy and surgery. This is where the real profits are to be found, and Breast Cancer Awareness Month is really all about corralling women into these high-profit treatments. The science, by the way, says that radiation, chemotherapy and surgery harm far more women than they help, and that cancer over-diagnosis and over-treatment is such a huge problem today that all these breast cancer awareness campaigns are actually hurting women's health across the board.

See these stories to learn more:

Why not prevent cancer?
So why doesn't the cancer industry rally women to prevent breast cancer every October? The answer is obvious: Preventing breast cancer would reduce the number of cancer patients being processed through their high-profit cancer centers. If women were to effectively prevent cancer by avoiding toxic chemicals, eating anti-cancer foods and boosting their intake of anti-cancer nutrients like vitamin D, cancer rates across America would plummet -- perhaps by as much as 80%.

And that, in turn, would hit the profits of the cancer industry hard, reducing both incomes as well as influence. Perhaps more frighteningly, preventing cancer would hammer the sales of products from companies that engage in pinkwashing campaigns. Pinkwashing -- which means introducing a "pink" version of your products in order to trick gullible consumers into buying your toxic stuff -- is now so common and profitable that all sorts of companies are using it to try to sell more stuff. You can now buy pinked-out handguns and alcohol, too, and they promise to donate a portion of proceed to fund breast cancer research.

But that's the real kicker in all this: We don't need any new research to prevent breast cancer. We already know how to prevent it right now! It's easy with vitamin D, exercise, fitness, superfoods and anti-cancer nutritional supplements such as medicinal mushrooms. Yet virtually the entire cancer industry actively ignores all these things. In fact, some organizations such as the American Cancer Society actually go out of their way to scare people aware from cancer cures, thereby resulting in more cancer. Just look at the ACS advertisements that try to make people afraid of sunlight! (They really just want to keep us all in the dark, both literally and figuratively.)

Why the cancer industry is terrified of knowledge
If the population really knew how to prevent cancer, the cancer industry would collapse within a generation. The cancer crooks know this, so they avoid mentioning vitamin D and anti-cancer nutrients. Just go to a "Walk for the Cure" cancer rally sometime and ask the officials there why they don't promote preventing breast cancer. Their answers will amaze you. They simply have no interest in preventing breast cancer. Their entire focus is treating breast cancer, which is a clever ploy for recruiting women into extremely toxic conventional cancer therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. They absolutely do not want women to know how to prevent breast cancer because that would destroy their entire pinkwashing scam and put them all out of business.

Let's face it: Cancer is growing into a trillion-dollar industry worldwide. There's a ton of money to be made from keeping women nutritionally ignorant, scaring them into cancer screening, irradiating their breasts with mammograms, and then charging them huge dollars to "treat" their cancers. It's a highly profitable scam that exploits the bodies of women for corporate profits, and virtually all the cancer non-profits are on board with this criminal scam. Breast Cancer Action, out of San Francisco, is one of the rare exceptions to this. They actually fight against pinkwashing and encourage women to "Think before you pink!" See to learn more.

How the cancer industry exploits women three times
If you think about it, the cancer industry actually exploits women three times in a row:

First, they exploit women by giving them cancer through the false promise of annual mammograms. These have already been shown to be a source of cancer-causing radiation that are more effective at harming women than helping them.

Secondly, once they've given women cancer through mammograms, they charge them money to poison them with chemotherapy, radiation or surgery. This leaves women scarred and suffering from permanent brain damage ( and kidney damage.

Thirdly, after they've given women cancer and then poisoned them, if those women are still alive they label them "cancer survivors" and ask them to donate more money to "find a cure." This is all completely hogwash quackery. The women who survive chemotherapy are actually chemo survivors, and the best way to help other women is not to repeat the same inhumane cycle of disease screening and medical poisoning but rather to teach women how to PREVENT breast cancer. That is the compassionate, ethical and practical way to help more women avoid the pain and suffering that goes with this entirely preventable disease.

The cancer industry is dominated by male cancer doctors, by the way, and it is no exaggeration to say that they exploit women's bodies for profit while causing indescribable pain, suffering and death among innocent female victims through their toxic and barbaric cancer "treatments." The entire operation is wildly criminal and inhumane.

Breast cancer is anywhere from 70% - 90% preventable through simple changes in diet, exercise, consumer product use and nutritional supplementation. I believe that the information found here on could result in a 90% reduction in breast cancer if these truths were known to and embraced by the general public. But the NIH and ACS won't tell women the truth about cancer. Neither will the cancer non-profits, nor conventional doctors and health authorities. Even the U.S. government is censoring truthful information about natural cancer cures that really work by threatening natural product and nutritional supplement companies with armed raids if they dare tell women the truth about the anti-cancer properties of their products.

What we really have in America today is a conspiracy against women, erected and operated via collusion between Big Government and Big Pharma, both of which benefit when women are sick, frail, afraid and desperate. A woman who can be scared into chemotherapy is easy to exploit for profit by a predatory cancer industry that puts profits first and human compassion last.

I feel extremely sad for those women who are being victimized by the cancer industry. There's no telling how many are maimed or killed each year by toxic cancer treatments which are entirely unnecessary. I have no doubt that in the future, this era of barbaric cancer treatments will be looked upon with total outrage by women, in much the same way that African Americans today look upon the era of plantation slavery throughout North and South America.

What the cancer industry is doing to women today is much the same as what many slave owners did to their slaves a few centuries ago: Exploiting their bodies for profit while causing immeasurable pain and suffering. It's no coincidence, by the way, that the greatest breast cancer profits generated today by the cancer industry come from black women. The cancer industry won't dare tell them that they're all vitamin D deficient and that's why their cancer is far worse than white women's cancer! See my video for the shocking details:

Slavery still exists, you see. It has just been reframed as "medicine." Having your breasts irradiated is much like a slave being hobbled with a wood axe to make sure they can't escape. Mammograms make sure you can't escape the cancer industry, and medical propaganda is used to make sure that your mind is enslaved as well as your body.

Real freedom from breast cancer can only be attained if you de-program yourself from the cancer industry propaganda and heal yourself by choosing to live an anti-cancer lifestyle. That's what we teach here at NaturalNews: Freedom, health and personal responsibility. We fight against the medical enslavement of women, and we take a firm stand against the exploitation of women by the corrupt, criminally-operated cancer industry

Monday, October 11, 2010



It's been a while since my last post. My health is wonderful, just about done with all of this nonsense. I met with a plastic surgeon a few weeks ago who was willing to remove the legion on my leg. I am scheduled to have surgery Monday, October 18th by Dr. Raj in Cleveland. Dr. Buttar thought it was time for the legion to be removed and finish up all of this. The surgeon is willing to work with our treatment plan which was difficult to find. Most of the surgeons wanted to treat cancer their way, which would mean removal of the legion, take out some of my immune system ( who needs it anyways?) burn me up with some radiation then finish me off with intravenous nerve gas ( chemotherapy). We were basically looking for a doctor that would not fuck up the last five months of significant progress we have made. The more I talk with "traditional" doctors the more I am sure I will never see one of them again for any ailment unless it was an emergency situation. It amazes me the total lack of logical thinking they seem to be missing when it comes to treating cancer.

I am scheduled to have two surgeries in the next month of so. The first is to remove the legion, which is now about the size of a silver dollar. The issue with the location is there is no skin to pull to cover up the wound. Once removed, the doctor is going to put a vacuum type device over the legion for a week or so. A second surgery is then going to be performed to replace the skin. The skin will be taken from my wrist or on my thigh, depending on how deep into the skin they had to dig out. The concerns are the legion may be wrapped around the tendon which could be a sticky situation. Dr. Buttar is convinced the legion is now a nodule melanoma which means it is sealed off from the rest of my body. He believes once the area is opened up legion should just come out with no problems. Should take 4 to 6 weeks of recovery time. I was told after the skin graph that I would be totally immobilized for at least a week to ensure the skin takes. This will give me some time to start blogging again.

I will keep everyone updated. I ask that all of you say a few prayers on the morning of the 18th that all goes well. Good intention from others goes a long way, I can tell you that from experience! I am confident this is the correct decision and all will turn out well!

Stay tuned, I have much to report. I have met some interesting patients and heard some interesting stories that hopefully will better inform all of you in regards to proper health and proper treatment of cancer.

Lastly, the cancer machine is in full effect this month. You probably see pink everyone, from the grocery store to the NFL players. This is complete bullshit!!!!!! This is a fucking scam from the American Cancer Society so they can continue fattening their pockets and NOT properly educate the public as well as pay off exorbitant salaries to their employees rather than put the money to cancer research. The money raised that isn't paid to its bloated overhead costs goes to fund the pharmaceutical machine. They have been claiming for 5o years the cure is right around the corner, they just need a little bit more money. COMPLETE FUCKING BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!! The ACS is the one of the biggest con artist on the planet and they do nothing as far as prevention and education for cancer. DO YOUR RESEARCH BEFORE YOU GIVE MONEY TO THESE SHYSTERS!!!!!! They are not looking out for our best interest. I will give you a more complete history of this shady organization in the next few weeks. It is appalling!!!!!!!!!!! If you want to give to the cancer cause give to those that provide direct assistance to patients in need. There are many good cancer organizations and many awful ones. THE AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY IS THE ABSOLUTE WORST!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do not be fooled by this nonsense!!!!!!!!!!

The pharmaceutical industry is never going to find a cure for cancer. They do not want to ever find a cure for cancer!!!!! Their 200 billion dollar a year industry would dry up overnight. If you think these crooks running big pharm are going to give up billions of dollars in profits you have lost your mind!!!!!!! Cancer has been cured naturally for a hundred years. The pharmaceutical industry and the American Cancer Society will continue to perpetuate this lie as long as it makes money! Cancer is a giant cash cow!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! How many more people have to suffer needlessly and die so these scumbags can make a buck?

Monday, September 13, 2010


Here is an excerpt from a very revealing book, THE HUNDRED YEAR LIE.

" Toxins expert Doris J Rapp warns us that the rules have been written in such a way that we can never know what is safe until people or animals in the wild begin suffering. The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976 allows chemicals to be sold and used unless they are proven to be a risk. The EPA, however, does not conduct its own safety tests, but relies on research conducted by the manufactures. Yes, you read it correctly. Is the fox in charge of designing the chicken coop?"

"Over the past three decades, chemical companies have provided the EPA with health data for only about 15 percent of the tens of thousands of new synthetic chemicals that have been introduced into the marketplace, according to a 2005 report by the Government Acountability Office, the investigative arm of the US Congress. EPA does not routinely assess existing chemicals, had limited information on their health and environmental risks, and has issued few regulations controlling such chemicals."

"When it comes to chemicals added to cosmetics and many other personal care products, the FDA knows as much about the safety as you do. Under FDA regulations neither cosmetic products nor cosmetic ingredients are reviewed or approved by the FDA before they are sold to the public. Ever consumer uses an average of 9 personal care products containing 126 separate ingredients each day, estimates the Environmental WOrking Group, AND AT LEAST ONE THIRD OF THESE INGREDIENTS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CAUSING CANCER OR OTHER SERIOUS HEALTH PROBLEMS"

Our government is not going to protect you from garbage like this. I was talking to a friend the other day about all of this nonsense and he said he believed he didnt need to think about things like this because the government and the manufactures of these products were looking out for the consumer. Nothing could be further from the truth!!!!!!!!!! The government cares about protecting giant multi national corporations that fund their campaigns. The giant corporations care about profit. Reliance on them will not keep you healthy.

Many of you have asked me what cosmetic and cleaning products I use. Most of the things bought in the grocery store or Cvs, Target should be avoided. I have done my research and found a lot of good products. I think the site is the best way to see if your product is safe. Throughout the course of the day we are exposed to so many toxins, many from our bath and beauty products. Thankfully I don't need to many beauty products to maintain my lovely appearance.

I use Dr Bronner's magic soap for the shower. I also use it as a shampoo, although I do not have a lot of hair so you may have to do your own research as far as that is concerned. Dr. Bronner's is made from all organic, natural substances. There are no added chemicals, perfumes or any of that nonsense. This soap can be used for just about anything. You can use it as body soap, hand soap, dish and dishwasher soap. It can be used for washing clothes and cleaning around the house. It is good stuff!!!! These products are usually found at health food stores, they can also be found online.

After a lot of searching I came across a good hand soap. Dr. Bronner's can also be used for this but this is a bit cheaper. The brand name is CLEAN WELL. This is actually sold at Target which was suprising. It is very safe and non toxic. Highly recommended. Most of the typical brands you are used to using are full of harsh chemicals that should not be rubbed on the skin.

CITRASOLV is a great dish soap as well as a household cleaning product. I found this at EarthFare for those of you who live in the south. I am sure it can be found at health food stores everywhere. Household cleaners have been found to be especially dangerous with young children around. They want to put everything in their mouths and often times the cleaner ends up there. Bad news!!!!!!

Deodorant is also one that has proven to be extremely harmful. Most of the products contain aluminum which is then absorbed into the skin. We don't want aluminum in our bodies!!!! It is responsible for many of the auto immune diseases many of use face today. I have read a lot of reports regarding the incidence of breast cancer and deodorants. I used a lot of the typical brands previous and they all turned out to be terribly toxic. The best I have found is the THAI CRYSTAL DEODORANT STONE. It is a stick of salt. Pretty bizarre but it works well! No yellow pit stains on the t shirts with this one either. This has absolutely no toxicity to it at all. One of the best products I have found. Health food stores usually care this. IF you cant find it there check out

This list should at least point some of you in the right direction. I made the mistake of assuming all of the products at the health food store were safe. I bought a lot of items and later found out they were just as bad as big brand name products. I can assure you all of the ones listed above are high quality and safe. I do not get paid for any of this, although if any of these companies would like to send me a check I would happily cash it!!! Dupont is watching, hopefully a quality company that produces non cancer causing products is also watching. This website is a great asset to all of us. Many of chemicals in bath and body products are causing cancer. A good rule of thumb is if you cant eat it, dont rub it on your skin. That goes for lotions, soaps, makeup, deodorant, and anything else. Most of the big name brands you find everywhere have tested highly toxic and should be avoided.

If any of you have found better products please let me know!!!!!

Tuesday, September 7, 2010


Below are the ingredients for one of last years swine flu vaccines. The list of ingredients is unbelievable!!!!!!!!! I cannot imagine how anyone with a brain could possibly think injecting this into your body could provide any benefit whatsoever. Vitamin D has been proven to be much more effective in fighting the flu than any dangerous vaccine. Get a good Vitamin D supplement or get 15 to 30 minutes of direct sunlight per day. I have not hear of anyone coming down with autism, severe convulsions, brain disorders and death from sunlight or vitamin D. Too bad those side effects are common from those taking the flu vaccines. Australia, Finland and Sweden have already banned the seasonal flu vaccine as a result of abnormally high fatal side effects in children. Finland and Sweden are amongst the healthiest nations in the world, we should learn from their example.

The government and pharmaceutical companies will continue using their scare tactics to get people to inject themselves with their poison. Don't fall for this bullshit!!!! I have seen first hand over ten people and counting at Buttar's clinic what these vaccines are capable of. Just say no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dangers In The Shots – Components Of H1N1 Vaccines
They are considered a biodefense agents.
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri

Daronrix: Glaxo’s H5N1 bird flu vaccine:
Disodium phosphate: a white powder, water-soluble salt. It is used as an anti-caking additive in powdered products. This inorganic chemical is also used as a fungicide and microbiocide.

Formaldehyde: a known carcinogen and reproductive or developmental toxicant. Interestingly, according to PANNA, in 2007, California used 30,328 pounds of this carcinogen, as a microbiocide [a drug or other agent that can kill microbes] on the top 50 crops grown in the state.(8)

Octoxynol 10: (Also known as Triton X-100) A detergent, emulsifier, wetting and defoaming agent. [Octoxynol-9 is a spermatocide.] It can alter metabolic activity, damage membranes, and cause a rapid decline in cell function.

Polysorbate 80: Also known as Tween 80. It is used as an emulsifier in cosmetics, and is one of the ingredients in Gardasil, the cervical cancer vaccine that is being mandated promoted for teen-age girls. This ingredient is known to cause infertility, grand mal convulsions, spontaneous abortions, and life-threatening anaphylactic shock. So far, 28 Gardasil deaths have been reported.

Sodium Chloride: Refined table salt. Salt is a naturally occurring complex mineral that balances the water inside and outside our cells. Refined salt, sodium chloride, is chemically treated and contains many other hidden chemicals that destroy natural salt’s healing abilities. The body can get most of its daily requirement by eating a well-balanced, organic diet –eliminating processed foods. A good source is untreated, natural sea salt.

Squalene: A natural oil found in sharks (mostly found in their livers) and humans. The American Journal of Pathology (2000) reported that rats injected with squalene triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation”, i.e., rheumatoid arthritis. How will this affect people who already have an immune inflammation, or will it cause untold new cases (lupus, chronic fatigue)? Squalene is being added to all new vaccines. It is linked to the thousands of military who have contracted “Gulf War Syndrome” and have suffered irreparable auto-immune damage, including lupis, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, and rheumatoid arthritis.(9)

Thimersol: (MERCURY). Put in all multiple doses of vaccines. Any amount of mercury is highly toxic. There is no safe level. This is has been repeatedly linked to the increasing rates of autism, multiple sclerosis, and ADD.(10

Monday, September 6, 2010


This post is in response to our friend Ross from Dupont who somehow found this blog and made a comment on the post about the safety of cookware. He posted a link that claiming the FDA and other regulatory agencies came to the conclusion Teflon is safe to cook with.

The article you sent about the safety of Teflon is a complete joke! Lets use some common sense here when determining if heated plastic fumes leaching into our food is safe. The FDA is the most corrupt regulatory agency in the US, possibly the planet. The FDA also allows drugs that are known killers to be marketed to the public without being properly tested. This same regulatory agency allows doctors to inject infants with mercury and persecutes doctors who are curing cancer through natural, non toxic means (My doctor included). These same regulatory agency allows farmers to inject cows and pigs with growth hormone and antibiotics that cause cancer and other defects in humans. I can continue for hours why trusting these regulatory agencies you speak of is complete nonsense.

The DuPont industry is one of the leading producers of chemicals that have been proven to cause cancer. The DuPont company has known about it's products promoting cancer since the 1930's when it was found that workers in their plants making dyes had extremely high rates of bladder cancer. The DuPont company covered up this information from the public and the workers who were being affected. They also had representatives on the board of the American Cancer Society and National Cancer Institute covering up the fact that their products 100 percent were responsible for spikes in cancer rates. If any of you would like to know more about the DuPont company and it's history of covering up cancer causing agents it produces, read the book THE SECRET HISTORY OF THE WAR ON CANCER by DEVRA DAVIS. The information in this book is appalling!!!!!!!! DuPont is directly incriminated in the book!!!!!! DuPont does not give a fuck about anyone or anything but profits!!!!! There track record proves this. Many of their chemicals are responsible for the skyrocketing rates of cancer in this country.

Dupont is also one of the main manufacturers of mammogram diagnostic tools which produce extremely high radiation in women. Sadly the public has been brainwashed to think these are necessary and life saving. Nothing could be further from the truth!!!!!

Dr. Samuel S. Epstein, chairman of the Cancer Prevention Coalition, warns that the American Cancer Society has close financial ties to the makers of mammography equipment. Five radiologists have served as presidents of the American Cancer Society (ACS).

In its every move, the ACS promotes the interests of the major manufacturers of mammogram machines and films, including Siemens, DUPONT , General Electric, Eastman Kodak, and Piker.

This bias hypes mammography, which Dr. Epstein and Dr. Rosalie Bertell emphasize is an avoidable cause of breast cancer itself.

According to World Wire:

“Routine mammography delivers an unrecognized high dose of radiation, warn Dr's. Epstein and Bertell. If a woman follows the current guidelines for premenopausal screening, over a 10 year period she would receive a total dosage of about 5 rads. This approximates the level of exposure to radiation of a Japanese woman one mile from the epicenter of atom bombs dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki

Do your research about the DuPont company and their products. See for yourself what they are all about. If you feel it is safe to inhale toxic plastic fumes when cooking, go ahead and buy Teflon. If you think receiving unnecessarily high levels of radiation from mammograms, go get one. Make your own INFORMED DECISION!!!!!

My question to you Ross from Dupont is how you sleep at night knowing you are spreading misinformation to the public so your large, corrupt corporation can make larger profits while the consumers you market to are slowly poisoned by your products? I feel bad for you that have chosen to make a living spreading lies to increase shareholder profits of a company with a long history of causing cancer and covering it up. Sadly, one day you or your family will be affected with cancer and it most likely will be partly due to the products you claim are safe.

Thank you Ross for posting that comment and showing the readers the types of bullshit PR techniques big corporations use to question data incriminating their products as being harmful. I would invite you to post comments anytime on this blog. You have done a great job in helping me prove my point, big corporations care about profit and profit alone. Human safety is secondary. Thank you for your help, you truly have provided us a valuable lesson!!!!!!!!!!


Hello to all,

I just wanted to say hello and let everyone know I am doing very well. If I don't post for a while I get texts, phone calls and e mails wondering if I am still alive. My health is great, I feel better than I have ever felt in my life. My third nipple on my leg is slowly but surely falling apart. I am going to see the doctor this week to determine the next step. I have been using something called black salve to get rid of the nipple. Some of you old timers may recognize this potent potion, it has been used for over one hundred years in removing skin legions, melanoma included. It seems to be working. The nipple is falling apart!!!! I will post some pictures soon on the progress of the legion. I looked at the pictures for the first time in a while last night, it is absolutely crazy to see it's evolution. Proof that Dr. Buttar's treatments work!!!!!!!!!! Surgery may still be an option to remove it, I am hoping that the black salve and melanoma peptide I have been using will do the trick. No big deal either way, been there done that with surgeries.

If you think this information is valuable please pass it along to others. I believe ignorance is the main reason why our population is so sick, obese and overly medicated. All which directly relate to skyrocketing cancer rates as well as and other deadly diseases, that ARE ABSOLUTELY PREVENTABLE!!!!!!!!

I read something interesting the other day about prescription drug use in this country. The gist of the report was the failing of the pharmaceutical industry to produce drugs that actually do any good. People who take the most drugs should be the healthiest according the the marketing and logic of the pharmaceutical industry. We all know that is absolutely not the case!!!! Literally every day on and there are stories about the pharmaceutical companies pushing a drug to market with known deadly side effects without proper testing. The drug companies are slapped on the wrist and do it over and over again. The only way to stop this madness is to stop buying their bullshit!!!! We cannot trust our govenrment to protect us from them either. The majority of those in power are on the take!

I am very grateful to all of you for your continued support and prayers. Please keep them up! Stay tuned till next time.

Thursday, August 26, 2010


Below is the link to a speech Robert Kennedy Jr. gave regarding the vaccine industry and the government cover up to the link of autism and other neurological disorders. A lot of you have children out there, this information is very important! This is just another example of the pharmaceutical industry covering up the ugly truth about the poison they produce. This is all very similar to the cancer industry! Cover up the truth and continue to con the public and the doctors adminstering it that it is safe and healthy. Nothing could be further from the truth!!!!!!!!!

I didn't really know anything about autism until I began receiving treatment at the Center for Advanced Medicine. Doctor Buttar is the chairman of the board on the American Board of Clinical Metal Toxicology among many other things. He has dedicated much of his professional life studying heavy metal toxicity and the effects. Your child's doctor has not. I have spent a lot of time talking with the staff and parents of the autistic children and it has become very clear there is a profound link.

A good friend of mine who is a few months pregnant went to the doctor for a routine checkup. They were asking the doctor why certain vaccines were given and she did not know why they still gave the polio vaccine. I don't know about you but your doctor injecting your child with poison without knowing why is fucked up!!!!!!! There is plenty of information out there. Look into it!!!!!!

Monday, August 23, 2010


Good afternoon boys and girls, today we will be learning about cookware. I assume many of you use non stick Teflon pans. I used those for the last few years, assuming they were safe, knowing they were convenient. Unfortunately after purchasing a new set of Teflon cookware I had to trade it all in for stainless steel. Aluminum, Teflon and other forms of nonstick cookware have been linked to Alzheimer's disease. Different forms of Teflon have been shown to leach toxic chemicals when heated. Other forms emit toxic gases that have been shown to cause brain damage. The safest cooking solutions are

1. Stainless steel
2. Cast iron
3. Glass
4. Unglazed Terra-cotta
5. Coated ceramic
6. Soapstone
7. Copper

I switched over to stainless steel and am very happy with the way it cooks. Although it can be a bit more work to maintain, the lack of toxic chemicals leaking into your food is worth the extra effort during cleanup. When the Teflon gets old the plastic starts peeling off and can often times end up in the food. I can tell you this from experience. I used to see the little plastic flakes in my eggs and eat them anyways. Not very smart!!!!

Cooking utensils can also be toxic when heated. It is best to stay away from all plastics. The best utensils are stainless steel or bamboo. I have been using bamboo and have found it very effective.

All of these toxins in our environment have a direct correlation to the increasing cancer rates in this country. Every little thing that you can do to prevent a toxic body will help. It may be expensive to replace all the cookware but nowhere near the costs of cancer treatment. Prevention is key!!!!!!!!!

Saturday, August 21, 2010








Thursday, August 19, 2010


Here is a great link to all things dealing with the sun. There is a great link to the best, non toxic sunscreens and where to find them. A lot of really useful information out there. Especially for all you Irish back in Cleveland.


Below is an article from regarding the dangers of vaccines. I thought this was relevant because of what happened at Dr. Buttar's clinic yesterday. The majority of his patients are autistic children. Currently there are children from Egypt, Italy, France, and many from the United States. I have spent some time talking with the parents about the condition. All of the parents say the same thing. My child was completely normal until they received their vaccinations. Usually it takes a couple of days to a few months before they start to recognize something is wrong with their child. Many of them lose the ability to communitcate. It is awful to see the effects of autism on these children! Yesteday, an eight year old girl from Italy who has been receiving treatment for two months at the clinic said her first word. She made eye contact with her mother and said mama. This girl is EIGHT years old when she first spoke. How does Buttar treat autisim? He chelates them which pulls heavy metals, mostly mercury out of their systems. How do young children have such high levels of mercury where they can no longer function like normal? Vaccines! Read the article below. It is long but it is worth reading. This is especially important now that it is flu season and the vaccine is being pushed heavily by big pharma because of the obscene profits they generate. Many of you have children and are faced with the decision to pump your children with as many as 20 vaccintions before they are a month old. Do your research on this subject if you have children and make your own decision!!!!!!!! Do not trust your doctor blindly! There are hundreds, if not thousands of books on the dangers of vaccines. This is some crazy shit!

Below is an article from

You have probably seen your nurse insert a syringe into a large vial, extract some liquid, and then leave a substantial amount of vaccine in the original container. If you've witnessed this seemingly benign procedure, you've seen how vaccine manufacturers are saving money at the expense of public health. In order to store larger amounts of vaccine at a lower cost, companies began offering "multi-dose units" while adding preservatives to prevent contaminations. That way doctors can open and close a vaccine container, inviting germs into the once-sterile solution, while assuring the public that those contaminants are quickly killed by the preservative.
Sound familiar? It's the same story of corporate America's love affair with preservatives. It saves them money, while posing an undue risk to your health. But like many toxic preservatives found in food, a vaccine preservative kills more than just bacteria and fungi; it can lead to extensive neurological damage in your children, and has even been implicated in autism.

Thimerosal is the preservative of choice for vaccine manufacturers. First introduced by Eli Lilly and Company in the late 1920s and early 1930s, the company began selling it as a preservative in vaccines in the 1940s. Thimerosal contains 49.6 percent mercury by weight and is metabolized or degraded into ethylmercury and thiosalicylate. Mercury, or more precisely, ethylmercury, is the principle agent that kills contaminants. Unfortunately, mercury also kills much more than that.
The Department of Defense classifies mercury as a hazardous material that could cause death if swallowed, inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Studies indicate that mercury tends to accumulate in the brains of primates and other animals after they are injected with vaccines. Mercury poisoning has been linked to cardiovascular disease, autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia and many other nervous system conditions. That's why the FDA rigorously limits exposure to mercury in foods and drugs. Some common sources of mercury include dental amalgam fillings, various vaccines and certain fish contaminated by polluted ocean waters.

The toxicity of mercury has never been in question. The real question is precisely how much mercury-laced thimerosal is toxic, and what are the possible consequences for our children at low doses?

Eli Lilly and Co. supposedly answered this question for us back in 1930. Concluding thimerosal to be of "a very low order of toxicity . . . for man," the company hired its own doctors to perform thimerosal experiments in Indianapolis City Hospital on meningitis patients during a severe outbreak in 1929. This 60-year-old evidence was still quoted on the company's brochures as recently as 1990. Andrew Waters, who is involved in a lawsuit against Eli Lilly, claims that most critical studies on the toxicity of thimerosal were suppressed by the company until now.

Banned around the world, but not in the United States
That might explain why thimerosal was eliminated in many countries 20 years ago. In 1977, a Russian study found that adults exposed to ethylmercury, the form of mercury in thimerosal, suffered brain damage years later. Studies on thimerosal poisoning also describe tubular necrosis and nervous system injury, including obtundation, coma and death. As a result of these findings, Russia banned thimerosal from children's vaccines in 1980. Denmark, Austria, Japan, Great Britain and all the Scandinavian countries have also banned the preservative.
Eli Lilly stuck to its "scientific" facts, but the truth began slipping between the cracks in 1999. After the number of immunizations rose to 12 to 15 per child, the public finally became privy to the possible dangers of thimerosal. One 1999 study revealed that some infants, due to a genetic or developmental factor, lack the ability to eliminate mercury. Trace amounts of mercury in these infants, when accumulated over several vaccines, could pose a severe health risk. Some vaccines, such as vaccines for hepatitis B, contained as much as 12.5 micrograms of mercury per dose. That's more than 100 times the EPA's upper limit standard when administered to infants.

Hepatitis B vaccines aren't the only immunizations under suspicion. According to Burton Goldberg in Alternative Medicine, scientists are finding stronger and stronger links between thimerosal and neurological damage. One report by Dr. Vijendra Singh of the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Michigan found a higher incidence of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine (MMR) antibodies in autistic children.

The National Vaccine Information Center in Vienna, Virginia, has noted a strong association between the MMR vaccine and autistic features. Reporting similar findings, the Encephalitis Support Group in England claims that children who became autistic after the MMR vaccine started showing autistic symptoms as early as 30 days after vaccination. The diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccine (DPT) given at two, four and six months has triggered autistic symptoms, as well.

When the FDA finally formally released this information in 1999, the news came too little too late for some parents. The damage had already been done.

Links between autism and thimerosal
Autism affects 500,000 to 1.5 million Americans and has grown at an annual rate of 10 to 17 percent since the late 1980s. California found a 273 percent increase in autism between 1987 and 1998. Maryland reported a 513 percent increase in autism between 1993 and 1998 and several dozen other states reported similar findings. Some scientists say the estimated number of cases of autism has increased 15-fold –1,500 percent – since 1991, when the number of childhood vaccinations doubled. Whereas one in every 2,500 children was diagnosed with autism before 1991, one in 166 children now have the disease.
This increase in reported autism cases eerily parallels the increase in the number and frequency of thimerosal-containing vaccinations administered to infants. As of today, children are given as many as 21 immunizations in the first 15 months of life. After a number of scientists and concerned activists noticed the correlation, an investigation was launched to get to the heart of the matter.

Statistical evidence links thimerosal with nervous system disorders
In June 2000, federal officials and industry representatives were assembled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to discuss the disturbing evidence. According to Tom Verstraeten, an epidemiologist who had analyzed the data on the CDC's database, thimerosal appeared to be responsible for a dramatic increase in autism and other neurological disorders. Verstraeten told those at the meeting that a number of earlier studies indicate a link between thimerosal and speech delays, attention-deficit disorder, hyperactivity and autism.
Verstraeten offered no possible cause for this correlation, but held that the statistical evidence linking vaccines and neurological disorders was strong. Dr. Bill Weil, a consultant for the American Academy of Pediatrics, and Dr. Richard Johnston, an immunologist and pediatrician from the University of Colorado, presented similar concerns to the group. However, given no causal relationship, the CDC and industry representatives were quick to discredit the evidence.

Consequently, the CDC paid the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to conduct another study on thimerosal. According to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., this study was fixed in order to "whitewash" previous findings. In its 2001 report, the IOM's Immunization Safety Review Committee did conclude that the link between thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders was biologically plausible, though the evidence neither proved nor negated it. The Committee stated that phasing out thimerosal from vaccines was “a prudent measure in support of the public health goal to reduce mercury exposure of infants and children as much as possible.” However, these findings offered no imperative. The data presented at the 2000 meeting was withheld from publication and the link between thimerosal and autism remained "inconclusive."

But what does "inconclusive" mean? Well, that depends on who you talk to. According to the FDA, these "inconclusive" findings negate the risk of a causal relationship between thimerosal and autism. Even Tom Verstraeten, one of the presenters of epidemiological evidence at the CDC meeting, seemingly changed his tune a bit. In 2000, Verstraeten vigorously campaigned against thimerosal based upon his "inconclusive" correlation, but after he was hired by GlaxoSmithKline, the doctor changed his position. The same evidence from 2000, in Verstraeten's eyes, became "neutral" in 2003. After criticism for this apparent flip-flop, Verstaeten wrote a letter to the editor of Pediatrics in 2004 backing the CDC's actions and his own research methods.

Merck continues selling vaccines with thimerosal
Without an imperative to eradicate thimerosal immediately, vaccine manufacturers like Merck & Co. seemingly took their time in reducing thimerosal levels in vaccines. After a large public outcry in 1999, Merck & Co. began decreasing or eliminating the amount of thimerosal in its vaccines. In September 1999, Merck announced that its new line of vaccines were preservative-free, but still continued to distribute the remainder of thimerosal-preserved vaccines until 2001. Only after a congressional inquiry in 2002 did they stop distributing their stockpile. Rep. Dave Weldon, R-Fla., called Merck's actions "misleading."
While officials at the Center for Disease Control claim evidence is lacking to support the possible risks of thimerosal, Dr. Mark Geier, a Maryland geneticist and vaccinologist, along with his son and research partner David Geier, says the CDC has chosen to ignore the science. According to Dr. Geier, more than 5,000 articles have been published that question the safety of thimerosal in vaccines.

The Geiers analyzed the data and determined that the more thimerosal a child receives, the greater his or her chances are of being autistic. The CDC says the Geiers misused information from a CDC database that was not intended to help prove theories. Given no real causal mechanism linking thimerosal and autism, the game seems to have become one of slanting the data to suit the needs of government and industrial interests. Even Verstraeten has admitted that these "inconclusive" findings certainly don't rule out the possibility of finding a link in the future.

Grassroots action against vaccine manufacturers
Given the dearth of health organizations owning up to the dangers of thimerosal, many parents followed their gut instincts and took legal action against vaccine manufacturers. More than 4,200 families have filed lawsuits claiming thimerosal caused injuries to their children. These lawsuits often have two goals: First, to seek reparations for the loss of consortium (basically meaning that an autistic child creates emotional and psychological burdens on their family life), and second, to ensure that these companies exercise more concern for public health and less concern for their own bottom line.
The lawsuits are slow in producing results. The first constraint on these lawsuits is the National Childhood Vaccine Act of 1986. This act stipulates that victims cannot seek redress in the courts without first filing a claim for recovery in the federal Vaccine Court. The statute of limitations for this is within three years of "the first symptom or manifestation of onset or of the significant aggravation of a [vaccine-related] injury."

In the cases of many thimerosal victims, the link between autism and vaccines didn't appear until six years after the first vaccine was administered. While this statute has stopped some claims against vaccine manufacturers, including such big firms as Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Johnson & Johnson, many judges are now allowing suits against Eli Lilly, the maker of thimerosal, to stand. While the Vaccine Act shields vaccine manufacturers, one judge reasons that the legislation does not protect the production of thimerosal because it is a "component."

The burden of proof in court is also extremely problematic for most of these suits. Given the supposed lack of scientific data, lawyers are hard-pressed to prove the link between thimerosal and autism. In what seems like an underhanded move, the CDC sold its data to a private company, ensuring that lawyers could not access it under the Freedom of Information Act.

In the past five years, Congress has also aided vaccine manufacturers, supposedly for "security" reasons. In 2002, a mysterious piggyback on the 2002 Homeland Security bill freed drug companies of liability in lawsuits regarding thimerosal. Called the "Eli Lilly Protection Act" by outraged parents and activists, the then-House Majority Leader Dick Armey told CBS News he snuck the amendment in to keep vaccine-makers from going out of business. Armey claimed it was a matter of national security. "We need their vaccines if the country is attacked with germ weapons."

Ironically, foreign biological terrorism hasn't been a big problem for American citizens, but those whose lives (and the lives of their children) have been affected if not ruined by the harmful effects of thimerisol would undoubtedly say these potentially harmful vaccines are indeed a problem. Armey's piggyback bill was repealed in 2003, but that didn't stop lawmakers from continuing to protect the vaccine industry.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is no stranger to the thimerosal debate, having received $873,000 in contributions from the pharmaceutical industry and $10,000 from Eli Lilly. Frist's position allowed him to attempt to help the industry from the inside, according to Kennedy. Kennedy reports that on five occasions, Frist tried to seal the government's vaccine-related documents and shield Eli Lilly from subpoenas. Frist also introduced a provision in the 2005 Senate Bill S-3 called the "Protecting America in the War on Terror Act," that would effectively insulate the pharmaceutical industry from liability for thimerosal poisoning. Pharmaceutical manufacturers, including Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Aventis, Weyeth and Eli Lilly, can basically get off scot-free for their actions, even as more and more evidence suggests that top company officials were aware of the possible dangers and did nothing.

A secret memo leaked to the Los Angeles Times reportedly implicates one vaccine manufacturer, Merck & Co., for knowing that thimerosal could pose serious threats to infants. Allegedly, Dr. Maurice Hilleman, one of Merck's top scientists, warned the president of Merck of a possible threat as early as 1991. Dr. Hilleman told executives that six-month-old children receiving regular immunizations frequently received mercury doses 87 times higher than guidelines for the maximum consumption of mercury. Given today's more prudent mercury standards, those thimerosal doses would be 400 times that of safe levels. Dr. Hilleman recommended in the memo that thimerosal be discontinued.

Not only do government and industry officials seem to be trying to downplay the possible harms of thimerosal; the media is also denying the issue coverage. Just recently, ABC flip-flopped on whether it will air interviews with Robert Kennedy Jr., a leading critic of thimerosal. ABC has been accused of suppressing the interviews because of its ties to the pharmaceutical industry.

The thimerosal debate continues
Along with the enormous amount of controversy surrounding this issue, the five-year-old plea for "more research" may have finally produced some results. Burton Goldberg notes that a defect in the myelinization process (insulation of nerve fibers) could explain mercury's propensity to cause autism and neurological damage. This may also account for the frequent development of epilepsy in older autistic children.
Scientists are also working on biological links that support the strong correlations. Researchers at Northeastern University, working with scientists from the University of Nebraska, Tufts and Johns Hopkins University, may have recently found the mechanism by which thimerosal interferes with brain activity. If these researchers are right, vaccine manufacturers could do little to keep the damaging effects of thimerosal hidden.

Pharmacy professor Richard Deth and colleagues found that exposure to thimerosal potently interrupts growth factor signaling, causing adverse effects on the transfer of carbon atoms. These carbon atoms play a significant role in regulating normal DNA function and gene expression and are critical to proper neurological development. Additionally, the scientists recently obtained more insight into the mechanism by which thimerosal interferes with folate-dependent methylation. The mechanism inhibits the biosynthesis of the active form of vitamin B12 (methylcobalamin), a vitamin now being administered to autistic children.

The experts speak on mercury, vaccines and thimerosal
Now all childhood vaccines have at least one mercury-free version, and I urge parents to ask for those versions if they choose to vaccinate their children. Injecting mercury into children, especially infants whose immune systems are still underdeveloped (hepatitis B shots are typically given at birth, before the immune system has developed), can be an assault to the immune system.
What Your Doctor May Not Tell You About Autoimmune Disorders by Stephen B Edelson MD, page 65
In 1999 studies began to surface showing that multi-dose vial vaccines, such as the MMR and hepatitis B vaccines, contained enough thimerosal to expose vaccinated children to 62.5 ug of mercury per visit to the pediatrician. This is one hundred times the dose considered safe by the Federal Environmental Protection Guidelines for infants! Worse yet, some infants will receive doses even higher; because thimerosal tends to settle in the vial. If it is not shaken up before being drawn, the first dose will contain low concentrations of mercury and the last dose will contain enormously high concentrations. If your baby is the unlucky one that gets the last dose, serious brain injury can result…
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166

Thousands of families say they can demonstrate with videotapes and photos that their children were normal prior to being vaccinated, reacted badly to the vaccines, and became autistic shortly thereafter. The number of vaccines given before age two has risen from 3 in 1940, when autism occurred in perhaps one case per 10,000 births, to 22 different vaccines given before the age of two in the year 2000.
Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104

We know that certain forms of mercury, such as methylmercury and phenylmercury, are highly lipid soluble, which makes the brain especially susceptible to mercury accumulation. These forms of mercury are found in vaccines as the preservative thimerosal. Once in the brain, it tends to attach itself to protein structures, especially to the cell membrane, where it can disrupt membrane functions.23 By binding to the cell membrane, mercury changes the membrane's fluid-like quality, making it stiffer and causing the cell to age faster.24 The brain is unique in that neurons depend on special microscopic tube-like structures within the cell, appropriately called neurotubules, for their function. These neurotubules are manufactured by the cell from a substance called tubulin. We know that mercury interacts with tubulin causing it to unravel. Studies in rats have shown that doses of mercury corresponding to those seen in humans can cause a 75 percent increase in tubulin inhibition.
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 53

In the case of the susceptible newborn infant and toddler, multiple exposures to mercury-containing and multiple antigen vaccines are highly suspect in the causation of multiple organ injury (Bernard et al. 2000). The GI tract, the liver, the pancreas, the kidneys, the immune system, and the brain are major sites of mercury absorption. Researchers have clearly shown a chronic inflammatory bowel disease due to vaccine strain measles in a subset of children with autism (Thompson et al. 1995; Wakefield et al. 1995, 1999, 2000a,b; Kawashima et al. 2000; Pardi et al. 2000; Uhlmann et al. 2002).
Disease Prevention And Treatment by Life Extension Foundation, page 153

Studies of autistic children have frequently shown very high levels of mercury, with no other source but vaccines found for the exposure. These levels are equal to those seen in adults during toxic industrial exposures. Several autism clinics have found dramatic improvements in the behavior and social interactions in children from whom the mercury was chelated. Results depended on how soon the mercury was removed following exposure, but permanent damage can be caused if the metal is not chelated soon enough. Still, even in cases of severe damage, because of the infant brain's tremendous reparative ability, improvements are possible. The problem of autism involves numerous body systems including the gastrointestinal, immune and nervous systems; as a result we see numerous infections and magnified effects of malnutrition. Intrepid workers in the shadows, that is outside the medial establishment, have worked many miracles with these children using a multidisciplinary scientific approach completely ignored by the orthodoxy. Some children have even experienced a return to complete physiological normalcy.
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 166

Mercury and autism mercury toxicity is a suspected cause of a steep rise—a tenfold increase between 1984 and 1994—in diagnosed cases of autism in children around the world, according to some scientists. Specifically, the culprit is thimerosal, a mercury-based compound used as a preservative in vaccines commonly administered to babies and infants. thimerosal-free vaccines are available. If you have a child who will be receiving vaccinations, ask for and make sure thimerosal-free vaccines are used. Kelp, with its essential minerals (especially calcium and magnesium), helps remove unwanted metal deposits.
Prescription For Dietary Wellness by Phyllis A Balch, page 198

The pertussis vaccine (DPT) may cause 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, affecting 15 cases out of 10,000 vaccinations; also caused by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) that causes mental impairment, gastrointestinal damage, and increased mortality in 6-12 months from impaired immunity; 9 out of 10 cases were not breast-fed; eating dairy products caused parasites in the autistic (take Vermex; contact Dr. Nelson in Mexico for control of parasites in children with autism). There are now over 500,000 victims of autism residing in the United States, in 1994. The pertussis vaccination is not used in Sweden, which has virtually 0 cases of autism, as does Holland. This mental illness afflicts environmentally and socially non-reactive persons, ofwithdrawn personality; with inability to speak, violenttantrums, insomnia, actions such as bolting across aroad with no regard for the dire consequences. May be caused infant antibiotic use in ear infections with subsequent yeast overgrowth, by cumulative genetic Brain damage, Vitamin deficiencies, or milk and additives allergies. Immune disorders in autism include white blood cellneutrophil Myeloperoxidase enzyme deficiency for insufficient hypochlorite ions to kill yeast - genetic type from Chromosome 17 mutation or biotinidase deficiency, or acquired type from lead poisoning, Folic acid or B-l 2 deficiency, infection or leukemias…
Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 450

Multiple vaccinations, especially in newborns, are another major source of childhood mercury exposure because of the mercury-containing thimerosal preservative. Over twenty-two vaccinations are now recommended for children before the age of two!
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 64

In addition, there is some anecdotal evidence that autism may be tied to diet. One theory is that, in very rare cases, a child's immune system could be weakened by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccination (MMR), which is usually administered before a child turns 2. As a result of this weakening, the theory goes, the child's digestive system is unable to break down certain food proteins, leading to abnormal brain development. Proponents of this theory believe that putting the child on a diet that eliminates certain foods, such as wheat and dairy products, could in certain cases reverse the course of the disease. This theory remains speculative, however, and research needs to be done to determine its validity. In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood.
The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292

Rather than calling for an all-out immediate ban on thimerosal-containing vaccines, they suggested that parents continue to have their children vaccinated with mercury-contaminated vaccines until new stocks of uncontaminated vaccine could be made available. Here are two doctors' unions that had to be beat over the head with an overwhelming amount of data that mercury-contaminated vaccines were harming children far worse than the actual diseases against which the vaccine was intended to protect them, only to have them suggest that parents continue to harm their children just to satisfy their vaccination obsession. Are you surprised to discover that recent investigations have found that several doctor-members of vaccine boards were either receiving grants from vaccine manufacturers or held stock in the companies? They were willing to sacrifice the health of millions of children just to fill their pockets with cash. These people should be looking through bars, not serving on boards.
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 167

Vaccines may afflict 45,000 cases of autism per year in America, which afflicts 15 victims in every 10.000 births: there are now 5 00,000 of these victims in the U.S. In Sweden not using the pertussis vaccine, there is virtually no autism (and likewise in Holland).
Anti-Aging Manual by Joseph B Marion, page 600

Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione. Vaccines are effective, but the production and use of vaccines should proceed more cautiously. Currently manufactured vaccines still contain harmful substances like mercury. The link between vaccines and autism is far stronger than the medical community is willing to admit, and more research in this area should be an urgent priority.
Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105

Studies indicate that autism may be the result of adverse reactions to childhood vaccinations. Dr. Alan Cohen, an environmental physician from Connecticut, notes that high levels of autism and attention deficit disorder (ADD) did not occur until the mandatory use of childhood vaccinations, and suggests that there may be a connection between certain vaccines and the onset of these conditions.
Complete Encyclopedia Of Natural Healing by Gary Null PhD, page 46

Almost from the inception of vaccination programs, manufacturers added a mercury preservative called thimerosal to vaccines. The practice continued until recently, and was stopped only because of the outcry from thousands of concerned parents and numerous experts in the field. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Practice did not warn parents or pediatricians that the mercury was dangerous until they were forced to. That mercury was toxic to cells had been known for over sixty years, but manufacturers apparently were more worried about lawsuits…
Health And Nutrition Secrets by Russell L Blaylock MD, page 165

In fact, a 2001 report issued by an Institute of Medicine committee examining studies about the health effects of the MMR vaccine in young children suggests that there is no proven link between the vaccine and autism. The committee recommends that there be no change in immunization practices that require children to be immunized during early childhood. Another disorder affecting the brain, Alzheimer's disease, may also have an immune connection. Alzheimer's is a degenerative disease that slowly attacks nerve cells in the brain. It eventually results in the loss of all memory and mental functioning. Scientists are currently investigating the role that the immune system plays in producing an overabundance of the amino acid glutamate, a powerful nerve-cell killer. Another immune connection that researchers are investigating is the idea that Alzheimer's might be triggered, in part, by a virus.
The Immune Advantage by Ellen Mazo and Keith Berndtson MD, page 292

In the past 10 years, the number of autistic children has risen between 200 and 500 per cent in every state in the U.S. This sharp increase in autism followed the introduction of MMR vaccine in 1975. Representative Dan Burton's healthy grandson was given injections for 9 diseases in one day. These injections were followed by autism.
A Physicians Guide To Natural Health Products That Work By James Howenstine MD, page 267

"Probably 20% of American children, one in five, suffers from a "development disability'," according to Harris Coulter, Ph.D., Founder and Director of the Center for Empirical Medicine, in Washington, D.C. "This is a stupefying figure and we have inflicted it on ourselves. 'Development disabilities' are nearly always generated by encephalitis. And the primary cause of encephalitis in the U.S. and other industrialized countries is the childhood vaccination program. To be specific, a large proportion of the millions of U.S. children and adults suffering from autism, seizures, mental retardation, hyperactivity, dyslexia, and other branches of the hydra-headed entity called 'development disabilities' owe their disorders to one of the vaccines against childhood diseases."
Alternative Medicine by Burton Goldberg, page 1101

Martin noted that the increased incidence of chronic fatigue syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism, and other behavior-linked illnesses "may be an inadvertent consequence of stealth virus vaccine contaminants."
AIDS And Ebola by Leonard Horowitz, page 493

Just for perspective if we go back to 1971 up to 1980, we see that California consistently added 100 to 200 new cases a year; but in the year 2002, California added 3,577 new cases. Since 1980, the documented start of California's autism epidemic, the number of new cases has steadily increased. If we break down those statistics it means that from 1994 to 1995, California only added on average 2 new autistic children a day into its system. In 2001, it was a rate of 8 new autistic children added a day; in 2002, it jumped up to 10 children a day. mercury-containing vaccines are still in use today, including the most recently recommended addition to the childhood immunization schedule, 2 shots of flu vaccine for infants, bringing the total number of vaccines up to 41 in California that a child will receive before the age of two. It will take a few years to start seeing the effect of the phasing out of the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal from childhood vaccines on this autism epidemic. Many symptoms of autism are similar to those of mercury poisoning. Immune dysfunction, visual disturbances, and motor dysfunction are seen in both. Treating autistic children for removal of mercury and other heavy metals has shown significant improvement in their autistic symptoms. Most autistic individuals have poor liver detoxification, low antioxidant levels, and low levels of glutathione.
Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 105

Since the 1990s, there has been a tenfold or 1000-percent increase in autism, an increase which has been linked by some researchers to the organic mercury preservative commonly found in baby vaccines. A greatly increased incidence of juvenile diabetes has been correlated to specific vaccination sequences and to the number of vaccines given. In some Australian Aboriginal communities, every second child died shortly after vaccination.
The Natural Way to Heal by Walter Last, page 309

The best current estimates are that autism occurs in 40 to 67 children per 10,000 live births. This means that the prevalence of autism has increased 1,000 percent in the last decade. According to the latest figures just released in January 2003 by the California Department of Developmental Services, California experienced an astounding 31 percent increase in the number of new children…
Building Wellness with DMG by Roger V Kendall PhD, page 104